Wiki Get Page Summary

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden, and it only says what content is returned (intro extract). It does not disclose behavior for missing pages, redirects, or disambiguation titles. For a simple read tool with an output schema, this is adequate but thin.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero waste, with the core purpose front-loaded and the terse 'Fast overview' as a useful trailing qualifier.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return format need not be explained. For a one-parameter read tool the description covers what is needed; only edge-case behavior is unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single 'title' parameter, so baseline is 3. The description adds nothing about the parameter (e.g., whether it must be an exact title vs a search term, handling of spaces/normalization).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('wiki page') plus the exact scope ('first paragraph (intro extract)'), which distinguishes it from the fuller wiki_get_page sibling. It does not name that sibling explicitly, so differentiation is implied rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Fast overview' hints at the use case (quick orientation rather than full content), which is enough to infer usage against wiki_get_page. But no explicit when-to-use/when-not or named alternative is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.