bugherd_list_webhooks
List all webhooks configured for the organization in BugHerd.
Instructions
List all webhooks configured for the organization.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all webhooks configured for the organization in BugHerd.
List all webhooks configured for the organization.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It implies a read-only, non-destructive operation but does not disclose details such as whether disabled webhooks are included or rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately concise and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity and no output schema, the description is adequate but does not specify the return format (e.g., array of webhook objects) or any pagination details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100% (trivially). The description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond the schema, which is acceptable for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'webhooks' with scope 'organization'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'bugherd_create_webhook' and 'bugherd_delete_webhook'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for listing webhooks but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Berckan/bugherd-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server