tidal_unsolo
Restore audio playback on all channels after soloing, returning the mix to full output.
Instructions
Restore all channels after soloing.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Restore audio playback on all channels after soloing, returning the mix to full output.
Restore all channels after soloing.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states the action without disclosing behavioral traits like side effects, prerequisites, or edge cases (e.g., behavior when no channels are soloed).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words, optimally concise for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While adequate for a simple tool, the description lacks details on error conditions, prerequisites, or explicit relation to siblings like tidal_solo, leaving some gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With no parameters, schema coverage is 100%. The description adds meaning by clarifying the tool's purpose, meeting the baseline for zero-parameter tools.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Restore' and the resource 'all channels' with context 'after soloing', which distinguishes it from sibling tools like tidal_solo.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied by 'after soloing', but there is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, nor mention of alternatives among siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Benedict/tidal-cycles-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server