@bearst/lucky-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to @bearst/lucky-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing and observing Technitium DNS Server through MCP, including read-only or read-write tool surfaces, scoped bearer authentication, audit logging, and confirmation gates for destructive operations.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables centralized management, proxying, and aggregation of multiple MCP servers behind unified endpoints, with a web GUI, server groups, tool filtering, and lifecycle controls.9 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server with HTTP/stdio support, a web admin panel for managing services, capabilities, and user permissions with Bearer token authentication, enabling relay and access control for MCP tools.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA secure MCP server for managing OPNsense firewalls through AI assistants. Provides 81 tools across system, firewall, network, DNS, DHCP, VPN, HAProxy, services, diagnostics, and security domains.81125 PyPI21MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables centralized management of external MCP servers with Keycloak authentication, per-user and per-group access controls, and audit logging.9 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables clients to access multiple backend MCP servers through a single endpoint, with OAuth 2.1 authorization, namespaced tools, and secure credential management.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 61 tools
Most tools follow a clear pattern of module plus action (e.g., list_web_rules, upsert_cron_job), making them distinguishable. A few pairs like list_storage vs list_local_paths or logs_stats vs query_logs could be confused, but overall the boundaries are mostly clear.
All tools share the lucky_ prefix and use lowercase snake_case with consistent action verbs: list, get, upsert, set, delete, run, sync, wake. Minor deviations like cron_logs instead of get_cron_logs do not break the predictable pattern.
61 tools is well beyond the 50+ threshold and imposes a huge cognitive load on agents. Even though the tools span multiple modules, the sheer number makes the set feel excessive and hard to navigate.
The surface is uneven: some modules have full CRUD (cron, port forwards), but many lack common operations such as deleting WoL devices, creating/removing DDNS tasks, deleting certificates, or managing security groups. The generic api_call escape hatch is restricted and cannot fully compensate.