Skip to main content
Glama
Barbaroso

apple-health-semantic-mcp

by Barbaroso

apple-health-semantic-mcp

Query your Apple Health export with an LLM, over the Model Context Protocol.

The hard part of this is not moving the data. It is that Apple Health data is full of traps that produce confidently wrong answers: percentages stored as fractions, sleep that changes date at midnight, three apps recording the same steps, device names containing an invisible character that makes LIKE filters match nothing. A model that reads the raw tables will answer fluently and incorrectly, and you will have no way to tell.

So this server ships a semantic layer: for every metric it states what the value means, which aggregate function is valid, and what is known to go wrong — and injects that into the model's context before it writes any SQL.

It optionally imports CPAP therapy data, so a single query can correlate machine data with wearable data.

SELECT o.nightOf, o.ahi, ROUND(AVG(h.value), 1) AS sdnn_ms
FROM oscar_daily o
JOIN hkquantitytypeidentifierheartratevariabilitysdnn h USING (nightOf)
GROUP BY 1, 2 ORDER BY 1;

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/Barbaroso/apple-health-semantic-mcp
cd apple-health-semantic-mcp
npm install

On your iPhone: Health → your profile picture → Export All Health Data. Get the resulting export.zip onto this machine — AirDrop, iCloud Drive, a cable, whatever suits. Do not unzip it; point the tool at the archive as it is.

node bin/cli.js setup /path/to/export.zip --write-config

That one command reads the archive, converts it, imports CPAP data if it finds any, verifies the result, and registers the server with Claude Desktop (keeping a backup of your previous config, and leaving every other server alone). Restart the client and you are done.

For VS Code, Visual Studio, GitHub Copilot or Codex, add --client — see Connecting a client.

Drop --write-config if you would rather paste the configuration yourself — it gets printed either way, in that client's own format, with absolute paths already filled in.

Reading straight from the archive is not just less typing. A real 83 MB export.zip holding a 1.4 GB export.xml converts in 16 seconds, faster than converting the extracted file, because the disk only has to deliver 83 MB. It also saves you 1.4 GB. Memory stays flat regardless of export size: the XML is streamed through a decompressor, never held.

export.xml and the extracted apple_health_export/ folder are accepted too, if you have already unpacked one.

Restart the client and ask something. Good first questions:

  • "What's my sleep been like over the last month, and is it trending?"

  • "Show me nights where my blood oxygen dropped below 90%."

  • "Does my resting heart rate go up after short nights?"

setup is a wrapper. The individual commands remain, and are what you want when re-converting a newer export into an existing directory:

node bin/cli.js convert    --in /path/to/export.zip --out ~/health-data
node bin/cli.js sync-oscar --out ~/health-data          # optional, CPAP
node bin/cli.js doctor     --dir ~/health-data

The configuration block, if you are writing it by hand, is in Connecting a client — one per client, since they disagree on the format.


Related MCP server: apple-health-mcp

Connecting a client

setup --write-config targets Claude Desktop unless told otherwise. Each client below has been checked against a running server:

node bin/cli.js setup /path/to/export.zip --client vscode --write-config

--client

Application

Configuration file

claude (default)

Claude Desktop

%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json, ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/…, ~/.config/Claude/…

vscode

VS Code (GitHub Copilot Chat)

%APPDATA%\Code\User\mcp.json, ~/Library/Application Support/Code/User/mcp.json, ~/.config/Code/User/mcp.json

visual-studio

Visual Studio

~/.mcp.json

copilot-cli

GitHub Copilot CLI and desktop app

~/.copilot/mcp-config.json

codex

Codex CLI and the ChatGPT desktop app

~/.codex/config.toml

Without --write-config the block is printed in that client's own format for you to paste. Nothing is ever rewritten blind: the previous file is copied to a timestamped sibling first, and every other server and unrelated setting is kept.

Three differences matter, because each one produces a client that starts cleanly and then lists no tools at all:

  • VS Code and Visual Studio read servers, not mcpServers, and expect an explicit "type": "stdio".

  • Codex uses TOML, as [mcp_servers.<name>] with the environment in its own [mcp_servers.<name>.env] table. That file is edited by section rather than parsed and reserialised, so comments and hand-written ordering survive.

  • The GitHub Copilot CLI reads its configuration when a session starts. A session that was already open when you added the server keeps its original list; start a new one.

Claude Desktop and the GitHub Copilot CLI:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "apple-health": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/absolute/path/to/apple-health-semantic-mcp/bin/cli.js", "serve"],
      "env": { "HEALTH_DATA_DIR": "/absolute/path/to/health-data" }
    }
  }
}

VS Code and Visual Studio:

{
  "servers": {
    "apple-health": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/absolute/path/to/apple-health-semantic-mcp/bin/cli.js", "serve"],
      "env": { "HEALTH_DATA_DIR": "/absolute/path/to/health-data" }
    }
  }
}

Codex:

[mcp_servers.apple-health]
command = "node"
args = ["/absolute/path/to/apple-health-semantic-mcp/bin/cli.js", "serve"]

[mcp_servers.apple-health.env]
HEALTH_DATA_DIR = "/absolute/path/to/health-data"

On Windows, write the absolute path to node.exe rather than node, and escape the backslashes (C:\\Program Files\\nodejs\\node.exe). setup does this for you.


Why a semantic layer

These are real defects in real exports, all of which produce a plausible wrong answer rather than an error.

Trap

What the data looks like

The wrong answer it produces

Blood oxygen stored as a fraction

unit="%", value="0.95"

"your oxygen saturation is 0.95%"

Heart rate is a discrete sample

475,000 rows

SUM(value) returns a large meaningless number

Step count is an interval total

one row per partial interval

AVG(value) reports a fraction of the real daily total

inBed overlaps asleep*

both cover the same hours

"you slept 13 hours"

Sleep crosses midnight

a session starts at 01:15

DATE(startDate) splits one night into two, inventing a short night

Several apps record the same metric

watch + phone + third-party app

step counts inflated by 80–90%

SleepApneaEvent is a notification

one row spanning 30 days, value NotApplicable

"a 30-day apnoeic episode"

Source names contain U+00A0

Apple<U+00A0>Watch

LIKE '%Apple Watch%' matches nothing, with no error

The last one deserves emphasis, because it is invisible in every tool that displays it. Apple writes device and source names with a NO-BREAK SPACE. A query that looks correct returns zero rows, and the natural conclusion — "this device has no data" — is wrong. The converter normalises it. See docs/DATA-TRAPS.md for the full catalogue.


Tools

health_schema

Lists every table and returns the semantic layer: measurement class, correct aggregate function, units, observed value ranges, recording sources, date coverage, and per-metric caveats. Call this first. Everything else depends on the model having read it.

health_query

Read-only DuckDB SQL. Writes are rejected with an explanation, not a generic failure. Tables load on demand. Rows come back as labelled objects rather than positional arrays, because column misalignment is exactly the class of silent error this project exists to prevent.

If a query names a column that doesn't exist, the error lists the columns that do:

Binder Error: Referenced column "measurementClass" not found ...

Columns that actually exist -> hkquantitytypeidentifierheartrate: type,
sourceName, sourceVersion, unit, startDate, endDate, value, valueText, device,
productType, nightOf. Note that measurementClass, aggregation and caveats are
metadata returned by health_schema, not columns in any table.

health_report

A summary across heart rate, resting heart rate, HRV, sleep, respiratory rate, blood oxygen, activity, workouts and CPAP therapy.

Every section declares how it was computed:

## Sleep  [per night (noon to noon), source: Apple Watch]
   Average 7.81 h across 14 nights (6.65-8.53)
   ! 2 sources recorded this metric. Restricted to 'Apple Watch' (14 days,
     140 readings); combining them would count the same activity more than once.

Three rules are enforced throughout, because breaking any of them yields a number that looks reasonable and is wrong:

  1. Nocturnal metrics group by nightOf, never by calendar day. Otherwise a night that crosses midnight is split in two and a fictitious short night drags the average down.

  2. Per-day and per-night values are computed first, then averaged. Averaging raw samples weights each day by how often the device happened to sample it.

  3. Where several apps recorded the same metric, one source is used and the rest are named in sourcesExcluded.

Choosing the window

Explicit dates take effect on their own — period does not have to be set to custom, and one endpoint is enough:

{ "start_date": "2026-07-22", "end_date": "2026-07-30" }  // exactly those 9 days
{ "start_date": "2026-07-22" }                            // that date to today
{ "period": "week", "end_date": "2026-06-15" }            // the 7 days ending then
{ "period": "quarter" }                                   // 90 days ending today

Named periods are inclusive of both endpoints, so a week is seven days, and they are dated in local time rather than UTC — the same wall-clock the data uses.

Every reply reports the window it actually used, and why:

"period": {
  "start": "2026-07-22", "end": "2026-07-30", "days": 9,
  "basis": "the requested start_date and end_date, inclusive"
}

That field exists because of a shipped defect: dates were honoured only when period was custom, so a caller passing dates the obvious way silently got the default window, correctly computed and confidently labelled. A report on the wrong period is worse than an error — nothing about it looks wrong. An unrecognised parameter is now refused rather than dropped, for the same reason.


Data model

One table per HealthKit type, named after the identifier in lower case (HKQuantityTypeIdentifierHeartRatehkquantitytypeidentifierheartrate). Every table has exactly these columns:

Column

Type

Notes

type

VARCHAR

HealthKit identifier, or the activity for workouts

sourceName

VARCHAR

App or device that wrote the record

sourceVersion

VARCHAR

unit

VARCHAR

Check it before comparing or summing

startDate

TIMESTAMP

Local wall-clock time

endDate

TIMESTAMP

Local wall-clock time

value

DOUBLE

NULL for category types

valueText

VARCHAR

The label — use this for sleep stages

device

VARCHAR

productType

VARCHAR

Hardware model

nightOf

DATE

The night this record belongs to

nightOf

CAST(DATE_TRUNC('day', startDate - INTERVAL 12 HOUR) AS DATE)

A night runs noon to noon and is labelled with the day it began. Sleep starting at 23:40 on the 22nd and sleep starting at 01:10 on the 23rd both belong to nightOf = 2024-01-22.

Measured on a real six-year export: 87% of asleep records are assigned to the wrong night by DATE(startDate). This is not an edge case.

Timestamps are local wall-clock time. The CSV keeps the original UTC offset and the loader truncates it at load, so "last night" means what the wearer would mean by it, in whatever timezone they were in.


CPAP correlation (optional)

If you use a CPAP or BiPAP machine and review your therapy in OSCAR, you can pull the nightly summaries into the same database:

node bin/cli.js sync-oscar --out ~/health-data

This reads the oscar.db that OSCAR 2.x writes in its own data folder — there is no export step, and OSCAR can stay open. The database is copied together with its write-ahead log before being read, so nothing is locked. OSCAR 1.x used a different on-disk layout and is not supported.

This adds an oscar_daily table: one row per night, with AHI, RDI, event counts by class, pressure and leak statistics, usage hours and compliance.

The join needs no date adjustment — OSCAR and this pipeline both define a night as noon-to-noon, so nightOf matches directly.

SELECT o.nightOf,
       o.ahi,
       o.leakTotal95th,
       ROUND(MIN(s.value), 1) AS lowest_spo2
FROM oscar_daily o
JOIN hkquantitytypeidentifieroxygensaturation s USING (nightOf)
WHERE o.maskOnHours >= 4
GROUP BY 1, 2, 3
ORDER BY o.ahi DESC;

Two things worth knowing:

  • OSCAR stores "not recorded" as 0 for SpO2 and pulse. If no oximeter was attached, every value is a placeholder. The importer exports these as NULL so the model cannot report a saturation of 0%.

  • Apple's "breathing disturbances" metric is not an AHI and the two are not comparable. It is a relative index from a wrist accelerometer; AHI is a count of scored respiratory events per hour from a flow sensor.

This bridge is deliberately narrow: one row per night, enough to correlate therapy with wearable data in a single SQL statement. To interrogate CPAP data on its own — session detail, event clustering through the night, pressure and setting changes — use oscar-mcp, a separate read-only MCP server for exactly that. The two run side by side.

More examples in examples/queries.md.


Configuration

Variable

Default

Purpose

HEALTH_DATA_DIR

(required)

Directory produced by convert

HEALTH_MAX_MEMORY

2048

DuckDB memory ceiling, MB

HEALTH_WINDOW_DAYS

0

Load only the last N days. 0 loads everything

HEALTH_NIGHT_SPLIT_HOUR

12

Hour separating one night from the next

OSCAR_DATA_DIR

auto-discovered

Folder containing oscar.db

CLI

apple-health-semantic-mcp setup       <export.zip|export.xml|dir> [--out <dir>]
                                      [--client <name>] [--write-config] [--config <path>]
                                      [--memory <mb>] [--no-oscar] [--limit n]
apple-health-semantic-mcp convert     --in <export.zip|export.xml|dir> --out <dir> [--limit n] [--dry]
apple-health-semantic-mcp sync-oscar  --out <dir> [--db <oscar.db>] [--dry]
apple-health-semantic-mcp doctor      [--dir <dir>]
apple-health-semantic-mcp serve

setup is the whole pipeline in one call and is what a first install should use. --client picks which application to configure (claude, vscode, visual-studio, copilot-cli, codex — see Connecting a client); --config overrides the file it would otherwise find for that client. --write-config merges the server in, keeping a timestamped backup and every other server you have; without it the block is printed for you to paste. A configuration file that cannot be parsed is refused rather than overwritten.

doctor is the one to run when something looks wrong. It validates the data directory, loads a table, and checks for un-normalised non-breaking spaces.


Privacy

Everything runs locally. The server reads files on your disk and speaks MCP over stdio; it opens no network connection and sends nothing anywhere. Your data goes to whichever model you have connected, and nowhere else.

.gitignore excludes *.csv, export.xml, semantics.json and *.db, so health data cannot be committed by accident. The test suite generates its own synthetic data — there is no real health data in this repository, and none should ever be added.

This is not a medical device. Consumer wearable data supports trend and correlation analysis, not diagnosis. Wrist reflectance oximetry in particular is not comparable to a pulse oximeter, and Apple's own documentation says so. Take clinical decisions with a clinician.


Development

npm test

75 end-to-end tests. They generate a synthetic export containing every trap listed above, pack it into real ZIP archives (including a ZIP64 one, which is what a multi-gigabyte export produces), convert it, build a synthetic CPAP database, and drive the real server over stdio. Nothing is mocked, so a failure means a client would see the same failure.

test/period.test.js is deliberately exhaustive about report windows. That is where the worst defect in this project's history lived, and it survived a green suite because every test had pinned period: 'custom' — encoding the implementation rather than the requirement. Tests should ask for things the way a caller would.

Requires Node 22.5 or newer (for the built-in node:sqlite).

bin/cli.js       setup | convert | sync-oscar | doctor | serve
src/ontology.js  the semantic layer: every metric's meaning, aggregation, caveats
src/convert.js   streaming export.xml -> CSV + semantics.json
src/zip.js       streaming reader for the archive the phone produces
src/setup.js     one-shot install: convert, verify, configure the client
src/oscar.js     CPAP bridge
src/doctor.js    data directory health checks
src/db.js        DuckDB storage, catalogue, on-demand loading
src/tools.js     the three MCP tools
src/server.js    stdio wiring

The ontology is where contributions are most valuable. If Apple adds a metric, or you find a trap that isn't documented, add it to src/ontology.js and the model will be told about it everywhere.

oscar-mcp — a read-only MCP server for CPAP therapy data, reading OSCAR's own oscar.db directly. Where this project pulls one summary row per night for correlation, that one exposes the therapy data properly: per-session detail, when events clustered during the night, pressure and setting changes. The two run side by side, and an assistant with both can reason across them.

Acknowledgements

The idea of exposing an Apple Health export over MCP comes from @neiltron/apple-health-mcp. This is an independent implementation; several bugs found along the way were reported back upstream.

License

MIT

Available Tools

3 tools
health_queryA

Run a read-only DuckDB SQL query against the health tables. Call health_schema first so you know the columns and the correct aggregate function for each metric.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum rows to return (default 1000, maximum 5000).
queryYesA single SELECT or WITH statement.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It adds the critical read-only guarantee and hints at needing the schema, but it omits details like error handling, result formatting, or any potential side effects. This is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with the core purpose front-loaded in the first sentence and a useful prerequisite in the second. Every word earns its place, with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is adequately complete. It tells the user the essential prerequisite (call health_schema first) and the read-only nature. It could be more explicit about when to use this instead of health_report, but that is a minor gap given the clarity of the query intent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents both parameters (query as a single SELECT/WITH statement, limit with max rows) with 100% coverage. The description adds no additional parameter-specific semantics, so it neither compensates for nor improves upon the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool runs a read-only DuckDB SQL query against health tables, identifying the verb, resource, and scope. It is distinguishable from siblings by emphasizing arbitrary SQL queries, though it does not explicitly name alternatives or contrast with health_report or health_schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: use for read-only SQL queries on health data, and explicitly instructs to call health_schema first as a prerequisite. It does not specify when not to use or mention alternative tools, but the guidance is actionable and sufficient for most cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

health_reportA

Generate a summary across heart rate, sleep, activity, blood oxygen, workouts and CPAP therapy for a period. The window is either a named relative period or explicit dates; the reply states which window was used and why, so check period.start and period.end against what you asked for. Use health_query for anything more specific.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
periodNoRelative window ending today, inclusive of both endpoints: week = 7 days, month = 30, quarter = 90, year = 365. Ignored when start_date and end_date are both given. Defaults to month.
end_dateNoYYYY-MM-DD, inclusive. Takes effect on its own; period does not need to be set to custom. Given without start_date, the window is the named period's length ending on this date.
start_dateNoYYYY-MM-DD. Takes effect on its own; period does not need to be set to custom. Given without end_date, the window runs from this date to today.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses a key behavioral trait: the reply states which window was used and why, prompting verification against the requested range. It also clarifies window semantics (inclusive endpoints, relative length), though detailed parameter logic is covered in the schema. It does not mention permissions, rate limits, or error handling, but for a read-only summary tool this is reasonable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact (two sentences) and front-loaded with the core purpose. Every sentence earns its place: the first identifies the tool's function and scope, the second explains window behavior and directs to the alternative tool. No fluff or repetition of schema details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the moderate complexity (3 optional attributes, full schema documentation, no output schema), the description is complete enough. It states what the tool does, how the window works, what to verify in the response, and when to use a sibling tool. It conveys essential information for correct selection and invocation without needing to list return fields explicitly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters thoroughly. The description adds only minimal extra meaning by framing the window as 'named relative period or explicit dates' and noting that the reply includes the window actually used. This is useful context but does not significantly enhance the parameter semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates a summary across multiple health metric domains (heart rate, sleep, activity, blood oxygen, workouts, CPAP therapy), identifying a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling health_query by scope, noting it handles broad summaries while health_query is for anything more specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly names health_query as the alternative for more specific needs, providing a clear when-to-use boundary. It also explains the window selection logic (named relative period or explicit dates) and instructs the agent to verify period.start and period.end in the reply, giving actionable guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

health_schemaA

List every available health table and return the curated semantic layer: what each metric measures, which aggregate function is valid for it, and the known traps in the data. Call this before writing any query.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the tool's informational nature and enumerates what it returns (tables, semantic layer, metrics, aggregations, traps). It could be more transparent about potential access limitations or output size, but the core behavior is clearly conveyed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, with the main action front-loaded in the first sentence and a clear directive in the second. No redundant words or filler; every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter metadata listing tool, the description fully covers what it does, what it returns, and when to use it. The lack of output schema is not an issue because the description itself enumerates the semantic content, and the sibling tools are clearly distinct.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, and the schema description coverage is 100% (trivially). The description adds contextual meaning about the tool's purpose and return value, satisfying the baseline for parameter-less tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as listing every health table and returning a curated semantic layer, including metric definitions, valid aggregate functions, and known data traps. This specific verb-resource pairing distinguishes it from the sibling tools health_report and health_query.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The explicit instruction 'Call this before writing any query' provides clear when-to-use guidance, implying it is a prerequisite for data querying and reporting. This effectively differentiates it from health_query and health_report, which are for actual data retrieval.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 3 tool updatesv1.0.0
    • First observedhealth_query
    • First observedhealth_report
    • First observedhealth_schema

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct role: health_schema provides metadata, health_query executes arbitrary SQL, and health_report generates a curated summary. The cross-references between them clarify when to use which, leaving no ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow the consistent health_<noun> pattern: health_schema, health_query, health_report. This uniform convention makes the toolset predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count5/5

With only three tools, the set is tightly scoped for a semantic layer: schema discovery, query execution, and report generation. Each tool is essential and the count is appropriate for the purpose.

Completeness5/5

The domain is read-only exploration of Apple Health data, and the three tools cover the full workflow: understanding the schema, running specific queries, and generating high-level summaries. There are no obvious gaps or dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables users to query Apple Health metrics, workouts, and trends from CSV files exported via the Health Auto Export app. It allows MCP clients to analyze health data such as heart rate, sleep stages, and activity levels directly from local iCloud Drive storage.
    3
    21
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables Claude to answer natural language questions about your Apple Health data by analyzing local CSV exports, supporting metrics like steps, heart rate, sleep, and more.
    6
    2
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that enables AI agents to query Apple Health data (190+ metrics) in natural language, including trends, comparisons, and structured exports.
    14
    196
    3
    MIT

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Barbaroso/apple-health-semantic-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server