web-doctor
Related Servers
Alternatives to web-doctor
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePerforms comprehensive website health audits including SSL, DNS, email authentication, performance, uptime, and broken link checks, all without requiring API keys. Returns a scored report with weighted metrics and actionable recommendations.771 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables scanning projects for dependency vulnerabilities, secrets, license conflicts, code quality, and git health, returning a 0-100 health score with actionable suggestions.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides comprehensive website validation across performance, accessibility, SEO, and security dimensions using multiple testing services including WebPageTest, Google PageSpeed Insights, Axe DevTools, Mozilla Observatory, and SSL Labs. Enables automated website health assessments through browser automation and API integrations.123 npm1-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables ethical security testing and attack surface management through SSL certificate validation, CVE queries, subdomain enumeration, security header analysis, and comprehensive reconnaissance capabilities. Designed for authorized penetration testing workflows with responsible disclosure practices.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenancePassive website security and trust auditor that checks for security, SEO, AI surface, email, and other exposures, producing a score and remediation plan.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables auditing of websites for performance, SEO, accessibility, security, and mobile readiness, with tools to validate URLs, run page audits, save results, and retrieve reports.1-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: check_website_health performs a detailed check on a single domain, while check_many runs a batch check on multiple domains. There is no overlap.
Both tool names start with 'check_' but 'check_many' uses a quantifier instead of a noun, deviating from the typical verb_noun pattern seen in check_website_health. Still, the pattern is consistent overall.
With only two tools, the server covers single-domain and batch checks, but the scope feels minimal. A few more specialized tools (e.g., SSL-only check) would make the set more robust, but the current count is functional.
The single check tool is comprehensive, covering TLS, headers, redirects, and latency. The batch tool adds value. Missing are tools for specific subchecks, but the core workflow of auditing and comparing sites is well-covered.