Skip to main content
Glama
Baneado98

OpenAPI Doctor

by Baneado98

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenAPI Doctor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A template MCP server with a built-in paywall gate, enabling free local execution and paid premium server-side execution via Stripe or x402.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A template for MCP servers that enforces a paywall gate, offering free local execution and monetizing premium features via Stripe or x402 payments.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Template for creating MCP servers with a server-side paywall gate, enabling free local usage and premium hosted tier with Stripe and x402 payment lanes.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready template for building monetized MCP servers that require per-call payments via the Mainlayer infrastructure. It provides a structured payment gate that ensures AI agents pay for tool usage before accessing server logic or data.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive framework for building and deploying commercial MCP servers with integrated billing, usage metering, and Stripe payment processing. It enables developers to monetize AI tools through a complete ecosystem including API key management, affiliate tracking, and automated deployment scripts.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that gates premium features behind a combined x402 (USDC per call) and Stripe API key paywall, ensuring only paying users access deep functionality while free tier runs locally.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no risk of ambiguity or confusion between tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool follows a consistent naming pattern by default; no contradictions exist.

    Tool Count4/5

    A single tool is slightly thin but appropriate for a focused security auditing server; the count does not feel excessive or insufficient for its niche purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core auditing functionality well with options for deep analysis, though additional tools for spec validation or fixes could enhance completeness.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing