A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceAI-powered property intelligence for instant zoning analysis, buildability assessments, ADU eligibility, flood risk, and development feasibility reports for any US address.
5
1
MIT
muni-dev-cost
by Baneado98
Related Servers
Alternatives to muni-dev-cost
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides AI agents with instant access to jurisdiction-specific landlord-tenant law data and verified state statutes across five US states and major cities. It enables users to query legal rules for security deposits, eviction timelines, and habitability standards with sub-10ms local response times.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents clean, token-efficient access to US civic & property data — geocoding, census tracts, Opportunity Zones, ACS demographics, and FEMA flood zones — sourced entirely from free federal open data.528 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceOpen-source MCP server providing real estate regulatory intelligence (zoning, permits, entitlements, deal scoring) for US properties, enabling AI agents to access 10 callable tools.125 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceQuery 20 structured datasets from AI agents — healthcare providers (9M NPI records), SEC EDGAR filings, PACER federal courts, USPTO patents and trademarks, OFAC sanctions screening, crypto whale wallets, DeFi liquidation signals, Polymarket smart money, economic indicators (FRED/BLS), federal contracts, NOAA weather, and OTC shell risk scoring. Pay per query, no subscriptions751MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides US real estate data including housing stats, demographics, nearby amenities, area comparisons, cost-of-living analysis, and neighborhood search via free public APIs without any API keys.6MIT
TDQS
A4.3/5.0
Scored across 14 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct aspect of municipal development cost data: basic cost, fee breakdown, water/sewer detail, comparisons, rankings, estimates, trends, and coverage listing. No two tools have overlapping purposes; even similar tools like get_dev_costs and get_total_dev_cost are clearly differentiated by scope (single-family vs grand total across categories).
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, e.g., get_dev_costs, compare_jurisdictions, list_jurisdictions, rank_jurisdictions_by_cost. Variants like breakdown_by_fee_category and estimate_by_units maintain the pattern with 'by_' prepositions. No mixing of styles or vague verbs.
Tool Count5/5
With 14 tools, the set is well-scoped for a municipal development cost data service. It covers basic queries, detailed breakdowns, comparisons, rankings, estimates, trends, and coverage metadata—each tool earns its place without being overwhelming or too sparse.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface comprehensively covers the domain: basic single-family cost (get_dev_costs), total cost across all fee categories (get_total_dev_cost), fee-by-fee breakdown (get_fee_breakdown), water/sewer detail per meter size (get_water_sewer_detail), category-specific breakdown (breakdown_by_fee_category), multi-jurisdiction comparison (compare_jurisdictions), national ranking (rank_jurisdictions_by_cost), state-level summary (summarize_by_state), cost trends (get_cost_trend), fee schedule provenance (get_fee_schedule_source), project estimates (estimate_dev_cost, estimate_by_units), and coverage listing (list_jurisdictions). No obvious gaps exist for a read-only query service.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues