Skip to main content
Glama
Baneado98

Mempool Doctor

by Baneado98
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Mempool Doctor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ChainID Guard

      Baneado98
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that gates premium features behind a combined x402 (USDC per call) and Stripe API key paywall, ensuring only paying users access deep functionality while free tier runs locally.
      MIT

    • @bitcoinbenji/mcp

      ocbenji
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server offering 26 Lightning-paid tools for Bitcoin mempool intelligence and sovereign on-prem AI inference, with no third-party APIs and pay-per-call in sats.
      26
      8 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Mempool MCP Server

      alexandresanlim
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides real-time Bitcoin blockchain and mempool data to AI clients, allowing access to comprehensive Bitcoin network information through various data tools.
      31
      6 npm
      5
      MIT

    • mev-history-mcp

      sebastiancoombs
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Pay-per-call MCP server for EVM MEV history, offering sandwich check, MEV exposure score, and pool density analysis on multiple chains with USDC payment on Base.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly described and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Single tool naming is inherently consistent. The verb_noun pattern 'check_tx' is clear and follows a common convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    One tool is minimally sufficient for a focused utility like checking transaction status. While it limits functionality, it is appropriate for a single-purpose server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers its intended purpose well, including multi-chain support and deep analysis options. No obvious gaps for a read-only transaction status checker.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources