ip-doctor
Related Servers
Alternatives to ip-doctor
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing DNS resolution, reverse DNS, RDAP-based WHOIS, and IP geolocation lookups. No API keys required , and all upstreams are public.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for DNS lookups, reverse DNS, WHOIS, and domain checks. Zero auth, zero config.532 npm3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server for domain availability checks, WHOIS lookups, and domain suggestions using RDAP and TCP port 43. It allows users to perform bulk checks and retrieve registration details across multiple TLDs without requiring an API key.121 npm-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for IntoDNS.ai providing 36 free tools for DNS, DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI, DNSSEC, MTA-STS, FCrDNS, blacklist and email security checks. Citation-grade report snapshots with content hashes. No API key required.45359 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that checks SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MX records for a domain, returning a health verdict and specific DNS fixes to improve email deliverability.1MIT
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server providing tools for IP, domain, email, and image-based open-source intelligence. It integrates services like Shodan, VirusTotal, and HaveIBeenPwned to facilitate advanced security research and data gathering.5682 npmISC
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly distinct: check_ip handles single targets while check_many handles batch processing. Descriptions explicitly differentiate the use cases.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'check' + target type (ip or many). Simple and predictable.
Only 2 tools for IP/domain reputation checking feels thin. While the core functionality is covered, the server would benefit from additional tools for advanced features like whitelist management or historical queries.
The tool set covers the primary use case of live reputation checking for single and multiple targets. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for checking URLs or managing blocklists), but the domain is simple and adequately served.