Skip to main content
Glama
Baneado98

email-verify

by Baneado98
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to email-verify

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • InboxValid MCP Server

      aayusharmaaa
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables email address verification through a single MCP tool, returning whether an address is valid, invalid, or risky.
      1
      -

    • InboxValid MCP Server

      siddreddy07
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides email verification as an MCP tool, checking format, disposable domains, and mail server availability with structured results.
      -

    • email-validator-api

      lazymac2x
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Comprehensive email validation MCP server that checks syntax, MX records, disposable domains, role-based accounts, SPF/DKIM, typo suggestions, and risk scoring.
      -

    • Email Verification MCP Server

      satvikkesarwani
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email verification, returning valid, invalid, or risky status with detailed checks and metadata. It enables verifying email addresses via a simple tool interface.
      3
      -

    • tvram-backend-mcp

      amoghar29
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes an email verification tool, returning verdicts of valid, invalid, or risky with reasons.
      -

    • Proof Inbox MCP

      timdoes
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP agents to verify email addresses using prepaid credits, with balance checks and receipt retrieval via a Streamable HTTP endpoint.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one verifies a single email address, the other verifies a batch. There is no ambiguity or overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: 'verify_email' and 'verify_many'. The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count4/5

    Two tools is appropriate for the focused domain of email verification. While more tools could be added (e.g., domain check), the current count is reasonable for the core functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers both single and batch verification, which are the primary use cases for email verification. No obvious gaps in the tool surface for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources