Skip to main content
Glama
Baneado98

contract-auditor

by Baneado98

Related Servers

Alternatives to contract-auditor

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Token safety oracle for AI agents. Honeypot detection, 17 scam pattern checks, LP lock verification across 6 EVM chains. Score 0-100 with risk flags. ERC Token Safety Score standard.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Smart contract security scanner for Base. Detect honeypots, rug pulls, hidden mints, proxy dangers, and generate audit reports.
      8
      44 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan crypto tokens for rug pulls, scams, and risk using a six-agent consensus system. It provides real-time security audits and risk scoring for tokens on Solana, Ethereum, Base, and BSC.
      6
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      On-chain Solana token safety for trading agents — traces coordinated wallet funding, same-block Jito bundles, serial-rug deployers and live coordinated dumps into one Exit-Liquidity Risk verdict before a swap. Free tier, then $0.02 USDC/query via x402.
      1
      17 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Per-transaction crypto trade validator for AI agents, validates trades with PROCEED/CAUTION/BLOCK verdicts, scans tokens for anomalies, detects rug pulls, and searches across DEXes. Powered by WaveGuard physics engine with deterministic PDE-based analysis.
      5
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly described.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Single tool has a clear verb_noun name ('audit_contract'), which is consistent with itself and follows a predictable pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    One tool is borderline but acceptable given the narrow focus of the server. The tool is comprehensive and not trivial.

    Completeness5/5

    The server fully covers its stated purpose of performing a quick security scan. No obvious gaps for the intended use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSyncing