Skip to main content
Glama
BPN-Solutions

VibeCheck MCP Server

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
scan_codebaseB

AI-powered security audit with real-time vulnerability database lookups.

Analyzes code for:

  • Authentication and authorization issues

  • API security vulnerabilities

  • Database security rules

  • Exposed secrets and environment variables

  • Dependency vulnerabilities (via npm audit)

  • Data flow and injection vulnerabilities

Returns findings with:

  • Severity ratings (critical, high, medium, low)

  • AI reasoning and confidence scores

  • CWE and OWASP references

  • Remediation steps

check_dependenciesA

Run npm audit to check dependencies for known vulnerabilities.

Uses the GitHub Advisory Database (same as npm audit). Returns known CVEs, severity levels, and patched versions.

Requirements:

  • npm must be installed

  • Directory must contain package-lock.json (or yarn.lock/pnpm-lock.yaml)

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: check_dependencies focuses specifically on npm dependency vulnerabilities using npm audit, while scan_codebase performs a broader AI-powered security audit across multiple code aspects. There is no overlap in scope or functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (check_dependencies, scan_codebase) with clear action verbs describing their functions. The naming is uniform and predictable throughout the tool set.

Tool Count2/5

With only 2 tools, this server feels severely under-scoped for its apparent purpose of security auditing. A comprehensive security toolset would typically include more operations like fixing vulnerabilities, monitoring, or configuration management. The count is too low for meaningful agent workflows.

Completeness2/5

While the tools cover vulnerability checking and code scanning, there are significant gaps in the security audit lifecycle. Missing are tools for remediation (e.g., fix_vulnerabilities, update_dependencies), reporting, configuration management, or continuous monitoring. This incomplete surface will limit agent effectiveness.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues