VibeCheck MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| scan_codebaseB | AI-powered security audit with real-time vulnerability database lookups. Analyzes code for:
Returns findings with:
|
| check_dependenciesA | Run npm audit to check dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Uses the GitHub Advisory Database (same as npm audit). Returns known CVEs, severity levels, and patched versions. Requirements:
|
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: check_dependencies focuses specifically on npm dependency vulnerabilities using npm audit, while scan_codebase performs a broader AI-powered security audit across multiple code aspects. There is no overlap in scope or functionality.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (check_dependencies, scan_codebase) with clear action verbs describing their functions. The naming is uniform and predictable throughout the tool set.
With only 2 tools, this server feels severely under-scoped for its apparent purpose of security auditing. A comprehensive security toolset would typically include more operations like fixing vulnerabilities, monitoring, or configuration management. The count is too low for meaningful agent workflows.
While the tools cover vulnerability checking and code scanning, there are significant gaps in the security audit lifecycle. Missing are tools for remediation (e.g., fix_vulnerabilities, update_dependencies), reporting, configuration management, or continuous monitoring. This incomplete surface will limit agent effectiveness.