Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to rootstock-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides real Bitcoin full node data via 17 tools, with pay-per-call in USDC on Base mainnet. Free tools include blockchain info, fees, and mempool; paid tools enable transaction tracking, address analysis, and more.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only on-chain intelligence for AI agents on Base, providing tools to read balances, token metadata, gas, and transaction status live from chain without API keys.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes real-time Hyperliquid explorer and analytics data from flowscan.xyz as 44 read-only tools, letting AI agents answer questions about protocol revenue, perp market positioning, individual open positions, wallet activity, and staking without an API key. It runs over stdio against Hyperliquid mainnet only, using the same API routes the Flowscan frontend calls.
      44
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fetch crypto market and on-chain data, including prices across venues, token facts, OHLC candles, market overview, DeFi TVL, and wallet balances, with two free tools and the rest paid per call in USDC on Base via x402.
      8
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to access a free catalog and samples plus 17 pay-per-call tools, settled in USDC on Base via x402, for web reading, source-bounded summarization, Rioplatense Spanish translation, market and Argentine data, developer utilities, text comparison, and x402-related queries.
      19
      40 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are namespaced and clearly distinct, but several read/status/event tools overlap: accounts.balances vs accounts.positions, history.events vs watch.poll/watch.cursor, history.status vs observations.status, and pools.inspect/list/observe. The verbose descriptions help clarify boundaries, but an agent could still misselect among these closely related read-only tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The entire set follows a consistent namespace.action pattern (e.g. accounts.balances, pools.list, registry.resolve_deployment, transactions.simulate). Multiword actions consistently use snake_case after the namespace dot, with no mixed camelCase or vague verb styles.

    Tool Count2/5

    37 tools is heavy for the apparent scope, especially since many are niche read-only observability/status/watch tools that could be consolidated. While the server spans multiple domains, the count exceeds the typical well-scoped 3-15 range by a wide margin.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a broad lifecycle across accounts, analytics, pools, registry, transactions, policy, and indexing. However, quotes.swap is a deliberate dead end without an audited SOR, and some transaction paths are restricted to allowlisted routers rather than general ERC20 operations, leaving minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues