Skip to main content
Glama
BACH-AI-Tools

Idealista7 MCP Server

list_buildings

Retrieve building listings from Idealista with filters for location, price, size, and publication date across Spain, Portugal, and Italy.

Instructions

List Buildings

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
orderYesExample value:
localeYesExample value:
maxSizeNoExample value: 0
minSizeNoExample value: 0
numPageYesExample value: 11
locationYesExample value:
maxItemsYesExample value:
maxPriceNoExample value: 0
minPriceNoExample value: 0
operationYesExample value:
sinceDateNoPublication Date Parameter. One of the following values. Indifferent: leave blank (by default) | Last 24h: T (Rent operation only) | Last 48h: Y (Buy operation only) | Last week: W | Last month: M
locationIdYesExample value: 0-EU-ES-28-07-001-079
locationNameYesExample value: Madrid
micrositeShortNameNoExample value:
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations and the description provides no behavioral details (e.g., pagination, filtering, authentication requirements). The description is merely the tool name, offering no insight into how the tool behaves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Excessively brief; under-specification is not conciseness. Every sentence should earn its place, but here the single sentence is too vague to be useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 14 parameters, no output schema, and zero guidance, the description is wholly inadequate for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

While schema coverage is 100%, most parameter descriptions are empty placeholders ('Example value: '). Only 'sinceDate' has meaningful info. The description adds no parameter explanation beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List Buildings' identifies the action and resource but lacks specificity to differentiate from sibling tools like list_home_properties or list_offices. It does not clarify scope or uniqueness.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other list_ tools). No context about prerequisites or ideal scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BACH-AI-Tools/idealista7'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server