Subdomain Finder3 MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Subdomain Finder3 MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables subdomain enumeration and discovery by querying the Subdomain Scan1 API. Returns all subdomains for a given domain in JSON format.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables external reconnaissance activities including DNS enumeration, subdomain discovery, email security analysis, and SSL certificate inspection against a target domain.13-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and agents to query domain intelligence, including registered domains across 1,584 TLDs, new and deleted domains, DNS providers, registrars, popularity rankings, and compromised domains/IPs through MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server that enumerates DNS records, detects SPF/DMARC/DKIM misconfigurations, and identifies dangling subdomains.251 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates ProjectDiscovery security tools to perform automated reconnaissance, subdomain discovery, and vulnerability scanning. It enables comprehensive bug hunting workflows by chaining tools like subfinder, naabu, and nuclei into a unified pipeline.76-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for passive domain reconnaissance and attack surface monitoring. It scans subdomains, security headers, TLS certs, and tech stack, detects subdomain takeovers, and reports changes since the last scan.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'list_subdomains' has a clearly distinct purpose that cannot be confused with any other tool in the set.
The naming pattern is perfectly consistent as there is only one tool. It follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('list_subdomains') with no deviations or mixing of conventions to evaluate.
A single tool is generally too few for a server's purpose, especially for a domain like subdomain finding which typically involves multiple operations such as scanning, enumerating, or verifying subdomains. This feels thin and limited in scope.
The tool set is severely incomplete for a subdomain finder domain. While listing subdomains is a core function, obvious gaps include tools for scanning, enumerating, verifying, or managing subdomains, which are essential for comprehensive coverage and will likely cause agent failures in broader tasks.