chat

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits. It mentions a required user ID for private bots, but the schema has no parameters, creating a contradiction. No information about side effects, authentication, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, poorly structured sentence containing a URL, instructions, a note, and a list of models. It lacks clarity and conciseness, with information not front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is completely inadequate for a tool named 'chat' with no schema parameters, no output schema, and no annotations. It fails to provide the essential details needed for an AI agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero properties, so schema coverage is 100%. However, the description implies parameters (bot ID, user ID) that do not exist in the schema, adding misleading meaning and contradicting the structured data.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description attempts to explain selecting a bot and pasting its ID, but it's unclear what the tool actually does (is it starting a chat? configuring?). The input schema is empty, contradicting the need for a bot ID. The purpose is vague and confusing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like 'chatgpt_gpt_3_5_powerful_and_accurate' or 'conversation'. The description mentions available models but does not differentiate usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.