Skip to main content
Glama
BACH-AI-Tools

Malicious URLs MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Malicious URLs MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching past scans and submitting URLs for scanning via urlscan.io, with both keyless and key-based operations.
      27 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to check URLs for scam/phishing risks, get verdicts with confidence and severity, report false positives, and monitor plan usage.
      3
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Wraps abuse.ch URLhaus malware URL database (free, no auth) – enables querying malware URLs via natural language through Pipeworx MCP gateway.
      27 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes urlscan.io as tools for security investigations, with compact results optimized for context windows. Enables pivoting on indicators, searching scans, retrieving screenshots, DOM, and scan results, and submitting URLs.
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_random retrieves a single random URL, list_urls fetches a paginated list of all URLs, and search allows querying by URL. There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tool names follow a consistent verb-based pattern (get_random, list_urls, search), with all using snake_case. However, 'search' deviates slightly by not including a noun, which is a minor inconsistency in an otherwise predictable naming scheme.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for handling malicious URLs, as it lacks operations like adding, updating, or deleting URLs, or more advanced analysis features. While the tools cover basic retrieval, the scope seems limited for a domain that might benefit from more comprehensive management.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a malicious URL server, as it only provides read operations (random, list, search) with no ability to create, update, delete, or analyze URLs. This leaves obvious gaps in CRUD coverage and limits agents to passive querying without active management capabilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues