get_profile_group_interests

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description discloses the pagination limit of 50 results per page. It does not mention authentication requirements, whether the operation is read-only, or any side effects. The description adds some behavioral context but not enough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that directly states the tool's purpose and a key constraint (result limit). No superfluous words; efficient and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with no parameters and no output schema, so the description is somewhat complete. However, it lacks context about whose profile is being queried (e.g., the authenticated user's profile or a specified one). This could lead to incorrect assumptions about usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details. It mentions 'up to 50 results per page', which could be interpreted as an implicit parameter, but no parameters exist. Baseline for zero parameters is high, though the mention might cause confusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'get' and resource 'profile's group interests' with a pagination limit. Differentiates from sibling tools like 'get_profile_company_interest' and 'get_profile_school_interests'. However, it does not specify which profile (e.g., current user or arbitrary), leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among sibling tools, there are other 'get_profile_*_interests' tools, but the description provides no criteria for choosing one over the other.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.