Skip to main content
Glama
Axcient

Public Gateway MCP

Official
by Axcient
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Public Gateway MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Autotask MCP Server

      haxos-anon
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Gives AI assistants direct access to Autotask PSA for searching tickets, creating time entries, managing companies, projects, and more via natural language.
      100
      Apache 2.0
    • Red MCP Server by BigRedCloud

      Red MCP Serverofficial

      BigRedCloud
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Big Red Cloud accounting data, allowing natural-language queries and controlled write operations with safety checks.
      100
      Apache 2.0

    • Vectra AI MCP Server

      vectra-ai-research
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to the Vectra AI security platform to enable intelligent analysis of threat detection data and automated incident response workflows. It allows users to investigate threats, take response actions, and generate security reports using natural language.
      23
      36 PyPI
      6
      MIT

    • Commvault MCP Server

      Commvault
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely access and manage Commvault environments, including job control, backup schedules, client/storage management, SLA monitoring, and optional DocuSign envelope backup integration.
      17
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    Two tools (get_billable_usage and get_client_info) have identical descriptions, making them indistinguishable. The add tool is unrelated, but the overlap between the other two is severe.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming pattern is inconsistent: 'add' does not follow the 'get_' prefix of the other tools. Additionally, get_client_info has a misleading name given its description duplicates get_billable_usage.

    Tool Count3/5

    3 tools is borderline low but could be acceptable for a very narrow domain. However, the duplication reduces effective count to 2, making the set feel incomplete.

    Completeness2/5

    The server's purpose is unclear, but the limited scope (addition and two identical usage reports) suggests significant gaps. No update, delete, or list operations for clients or usage data.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources