atas_quote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Live quote snapshot' clearly signals a read-only, non-mutating operation, and the description lists what data is returned. It does not mention rate limits or connectivity requirements, but for a parameterless snapshot tool these omissions are minor.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single well-structured sentence with a front-loaded label followed by a concise list of included data fields. Every word adds value and there is no redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple parameterless tool with an output schema, the description is complete: it names the data categories returned, signals the live/snapshot nature, and requires no parameter guidance. The presence of an output schema covers detailed return structure, so nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify. The empty input schema is fully sufficient, and the description does not need to compensate for any undocumented inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource as a live quote snapshot and enumerates its contents: last traded price, best bid/ask with sizes, cumulative DOM volume, spread, and tick size. It is specific and unambiguous, though it does not explicitly contrast itself with sibling tools like atas_dom or atas_snapshot.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as atas_dom, atas_candles, or atas_snapshot. It does not state exclusions, prerequisites, or a preferred use case beyond the implied 'get a quote' scenario.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.