audit_project and audit_sprint target clearly distinct scopes (whole project vs. individual sprint), so an agent can always pick the right one. No overlapping purpose exists between the two tools.

Both names follow an identical verb_noun snake_case pattern (audit_*), directly mirroring the two domain objects. There is no deviation or mixed convention.

Two tools is thin for a server positioning itself as an enterprise-grade auditing suite; the surface feels narrow even for a deliberately focused auditor. It is not egregious, but it sits at the low end of usefulness.

Project-level and sprint-level auditing are covered, but obvious adjacent operations are absent — e.g. issue/task-level audit, backlog or board analysis, historical trend reporting, or exporting audit results. Agents will hit dead ends for anything outside those two scopes, and the 'Premium' gating on half the surface further narrows coverage.