A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server for generating Seedance 2.5 videos via MuAPI, enabling text-to-video, image-to-video, first/last frame, and omni reference workflows with 720p/480p resolution selection.
6
MIT
VideoGenerationMCP
by AvivK5498
Related Servers
Alternatives to VideoGenerationMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Pixmax API enabling generation of images, video, text, audio, and 3D across dozens of models like Midjourney, Kling, and ElevenLabs.10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for generating, editing, and batch processing videos using xAI's Grok Imagine Video API, with support for text-to-video, image-to-video, and video editing via natural language prompts.477 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for leeshfield, a video generation platform, enabling AI clients to log in via OAuth, upload assets, and generate videos with credit estimates and job polling.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOne MCP server for music, image, video, and audio generation across Suno, Grok Imagine, Seedance, Kling, Hailuo, Wan, VEO, Ideogram, and GPT Image 2. Generate, edit, upscale, reframe, and master through one API key and one credit pool.1668 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for 4K video generation using Google VEO 3.1 — text-to-video, image-to-video, video extension, and frame interpolation.2MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 24 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes. The two Seedance generation tools (generate_seedance_video and generate_seedance_first_last) and the two audio-mixing tools (mix_music_into_video and mix_narration) have some overlap, but their descriptions clarify the different use cases.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., list_assets, generate_kling_video, upload_asset). There are no mixed conventions or inconsistent verb styles.
Tool Count4/5
At 24 tools, the count is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but justifiable given the server's comprehensive video-generation and post-production scope. Each tool serves a distinct function in the pipeline, so none feel redundant.
Completeness4/5
The server covers the full video creation workflow: generation, voiceover, music, SFX, asset management, editing, mixing, and captions. Minor gaps exist, such as no list_tasks or cancel_task, but these do not significantly impede the core use case.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues