sf-docs-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sf-docs-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLMs to scrape, index, and search modern and legacy Salesforce documentation by piercing complex Shadow DOM and iframe structures. It supports hierarchical spidering of entire guides and local RAG capabilities using a SQLite database for offline querying.52 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to crawl, index, and retrieve information from technical documentation using semantic search, with optional knowledge graph validation for code hallucination detection.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Salesforce developers to create code and configuration using local documentation, with optional semantic search.6 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to explore Salesforce metadata by parsing object and field definitions, reducing hallucination when working with Salesforce repositories.7-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to query a pre-built semantic knowledge graph of code, reducing token usage and tool calls. Supports 16 tools for code exploration, analysis, and context building.5 npm7MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI agents with secure access to Salesforce data and operations, enabling natural language interaction with CRM for sales, marketing, and executive teams.65-
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Most tools target distinct resources (domains, topics, Apex, objects, errors, limits), but sf_search and sf_semantic_search both serve general search and could be confused; sf_apex_lookup also overlaps with sf_search for Apex-specific queries. Overall mostly clear.
All tools share the 'sf_' prefix, but the action placement is inconsistent: some follow verb_noun (list_domains, read_topic, explain_error), others are noun phrases (apex_lookup, object_reference, limits, semantic_search). This mixed convention reduces predictability.
12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for a documentation server, covering various access patterns without being overwhelming.
The tool set covers discovery (domains, search), reading (topics, lookups), and specialized queries (code examples, errors, limits). A minor gap is the lack of an explicit tool to enumerate all topics within a domain, but graph_query and search mitigate this.