Skip to main content
Glama

quip_read_document

Read content from Quip documents using thread IDs to access and retrieve document information.

Instructions

Read the content of a Quip document by its thread ID

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
threadIdYesThe Quip document thread ID

Implementation Reference

  • The `readDocument` method contains the core execution logic for the `quip_read_document` tool. It runs a Python script (`quip_edit.py`) with the threadId and 'read' argument to fetch the document content.
    private async readDocument(threadId: string) {
      try {
        console.log(`Reading document ${threadId}...`);
        
        // Execute the Python script to read the document
        const command = `python -u ${path.join(SCRIPTS_DIR, 'quip_edit.py')} ${threadId} read`;
        const { stdout, stderr } = await execAsync(command);
        
        if (stderr) {
          console.error(`Error reading document: ${stderr}`);
          throw new Error(stderr);
        }
    
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: stdout || 'Document read successfully, but no content was returned',
            },
          ],
        };
      } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error reading document:', error);
        throw error;
      }
    }
  • The switch case in the CallToolRequestSchema handler that validates input and dispatches to the `readDocument` implementation.
    case 'quip_read_document': {
      const typedArgs = args as any;
      if (!typedArgs.threadId) {
        throw new McpError(ErrorCode.InvalidParams, 'threadId is required');
      }
      return await this.readDocument(String(typedArgs.threadId));
    }
  • src/index.ts:51-64 (registration)
    Tool registration in the ListToolsRequestSchema response, defining name, description, and input schema.
    {
      name: 'quip_read_document',
      description: 'Read the content of a Quip document by its thread ID',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          threadId: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'The Quip document thread ID'
          }
        },
        required: ['threadId'],
      },
    },
  • The input schema defining the required `threadId` parameter for the tool.
    inputSchema: {
      type: 'object',
      properties: {
        threadId: {
          type: 'string',
          description: 'The Quip document thread ID'
        }
      },
      required: ['threadId'],
    },
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the tool reads content, implying it's a read-only operation, but doesn't clarify aspects like authentication requirements, rate limits, error handling, or what the output looks like (e.g., format of the returned content). For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that efficiently conveys the core functionality without unnecessary words. It's front-loaded with the main action and resource, making it easy to parse. There's no wasted information, earning it a top score for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete for effective tool use. It doesn't address behavioral traits (e.g., read-only nature, potential errors), output details, or usage context relative to siblings. For a tool with no structured support, the description should do more to fill these gaps, making it inadequate overall.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds minimal semantic value beyond the input schema, which has 100% coverage. It mentions the thread ID parameter but doesn't explain what a thread ID is, how to obtain it, or its format. Since the schema already documents the parameter adequately, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate, as the description doesn't compensate with additional insights.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Read') and resource ('content of a Quip document'), making the purpose immediately understandable. It specifies the required parameter ('by its thread ID'), which adds precision. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like quip_append_content or quip_replace_content, which prevents a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention scenarios where reading is appropriate (e.g., retrieving content without modification) or contrast it with siblings that modify content (e.g., quip_append_content for adding text). This lack of contextual direction leaves the agent to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AvinashBole/quip-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server