get_name_servers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, and the description only implies a read operation ('Get') without disclosing behavioral traits such as rate limits, authentication requirements, or error handling. The agent lacks information about what happens if the domain is invalid or missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no clutter. However, it could be slightly restructured to include more key information without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description should ideally explain the return format (e.g., list of nameservers) or error handling. It is incomplete for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description merely mentions 'domain' in backticks without adding any context on format, constraints, or examples. This provides no additional value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'active nameservers for domain', making the tool's purpose understandable. However, it does not distinguish it from sibling tools like 'get_dns_record' or 'list_dns_records'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it is not mentioned that this tool is for reading nameservers, while 'update_name_servers' is for modifying them.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.