Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to DevProjex MCP Server

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Repomix MCP Server enables AI models to efficiently analyze codebases by packaging local or remote repositories into optimized single files, with intelligent compression via Tree-sitter to significantly reduce token usage while preserving code structure and essential signatures.
    120,020 npm
    28,502
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A code ingestion tool that transforms your code into AI-optimized prompts instantly. Gather the relevant context with code2prompt under the hood. Learn more at code2prompt.dev
    7,700
    MIT

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server that lets AI assistants inspect local workspace files, search context, view git diffs, and fetch a fixed GitHub profile, all within a sandboxed stdio transport.
    5
    -
  • F
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A read-only MCP server that gives AI coding agents structured access to a project's source code, architecture, documentation, and Git context through 16 tools for searching, reading, and comparing evidence without modifying files.
    16
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that gives LLMs structured, read-only insight into local code repositories — directory tree, languages, dependencies, scripts, and config files.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Secure multi-source MCP server for reading local, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and network source code with read-only-by-default access, enabling AI assistants to inspect repositories safely.
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: listing projects, viewing trees, reading files, building/reading packs, regex searching, and analyzing sizes. read_pack and get_file are similar in mechanics but clearly separated by pack vs. individual file scope.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most names follow a clear verb_noun pattern (list_projects, get_tree, pack_context, read_pack, search_project, get_file). The single outlier is 'analyze', which would be more consistent as something like analyze_project.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well-scoped for a project context and redaction server. Each tool has a clear role with no obvious redundancy or bloat.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the main workflow: discover projects, inspect tree/files, search, build a pack, and read pack contents. Minor gaps exist, such as no pack-specific search or profile management, but agents can work around them.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessResponsive