Skip to main content
Glama
SEO Performance MCP

SEO Performance MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to SEO Performance MCP

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    AutomateLab AI SEO Magic Button runs a whole-site AEO/GEO audit and generates a prioritized plan an agent can execute. It combines AI-SEO and Citation Intelligence and ships as a skill, plugin, and MCP server. Product and documentation: https://automatelab.tech/products/skills-and-plugins/ai-seo-magic-button/
    1
    26 npm
    2
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Professional Google Search Console MCP server providing 40+ SEO tools for performance analysis, content decay, CTR opportunities, and more, enabling real search data in clients like Cursor and Claude.
    40
    13 npm
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that pulls PageSpeed Insights and Google Search Console data across multiple owned sites, enabling cross-site performance reports and synthesis via Claude.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A production-oriented, read-only Google Search Console MCP server and TypeScript SDK for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, and other MCP clients. Query real Search Console data, inspect indexed URLs, review sitemaps, compare periods, and surface transparent SEO opportunities without handing private data to a third-party SaaS.
    20
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Model Context Protocol server for SignalSumo that lets Claude, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible clients read SEO data, run technical audits, research keywords, and check backlink profiles through natural-language tool calls.
    9 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Open-source MCP server that audits websites for AI search readiness, providing deterministic scoring (0-100) and prioritized fix lists for metrics like JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, and AI crawler access.
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 9 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool targets a distinct stage of the pipeline (discover, snapshot, analyze, verdict, brief, cohort, citation-loss, two platform-specific quick-win scans). posts_snapshot and posts_decay_curve both draw on GSC data but are clearly differentiated by purpose (raw multi-source snapshot vs. weekly trend classification), so only minor overlap remains.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a consistent domain_action pattern (posts_list, posts_snapshot, posts_verdict, gsc_quick_wins, bing_quick_wins). cohort_report and the quick_wins names break the verb-style slightly, but all remain readable and predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Nine tools map cleanly onto a coherent SEO-analysis workflow, each earning its place without redundancy. This is squarely in the well-scoped 3-15 range.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers discovery, multi-source snapshots, decay analysis, verdict, human briefs, cohort ranking, citation loss, and GSC/Bing quick wins - a full read-side lifecycle. Gaps like historical time-series comparison or competitor benchmarking are minor and workable around.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues