Skip to main content
Glama
AutomateLab-tech

SEO Performance MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to SEO Performance MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Professional Google Search Console MCP server providing 40+ SEO tools for performance analysis, content decay, CTR opportunities, and more, enabling real search data in clients like Cursor and Claude.
      40
      12 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that pulls PageSpeed Insights and Google Search Console data across multiple owned sites, enabling cross-site performance reports and synthesis via Claude.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A production-oriented, read-only Google Search Console MCP server and TypeScript SDK for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, and other MCP clients. Query real Search Console data, inspect indexed URLs, review sitemaps, compare periods, and surface transparent SEO opportunities without handing private data to a third-party SaaS.
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server for SignalSumo that lets Claude, Cursor, and other MCP-compatible clients read SEO data, run technical audits, research keywords, and check backlink profiles through natural-language tool calls.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP server that audits websites for AI search readiness, providing deterministic scoring (0-100) and prioritized fix lists for metrics like JSON-LD, llms.txt, heading hierarchy, and AI crawler access.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: cohort aggregate analysis, GSC quick wins, citation loss, decay curve, post discovery, brief generation, snapshot, and single-post verdict. No two tools overlap in purpose, and descriptions clearly differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent dot-separated category.action pattern (e.g., posts.list, posts.snapshot, gsc.quick_wins) with lowercase and underscores. No deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for an SEO performance server. Each tool addresses a specific step in the analysis workflow without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflow: discovery, data gathering, trend analysis, verdict, and reporting. Missing are direct action tools (e.g., rewrite or update posts), but this is by design—the brief serves as a hand-off. Minor gap in not having a cohort comparison tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues