Skip to main content
Glama
AutomateLab-tech

automatelab-ai-seo

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to automatelab-ai-seo

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    AutomateLab Citation Intelligence reports which URLs ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Bing and Google AI Overviews cite. Self-hosted with your own engine API keys. Product and documentation: https://automatelab.tech/products/mcp/citation-intelligence/
    26
    75 npm
    9
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A production-ready Model Context Protocol server that brings AI-powered web search directly into development environments, providing intelligent search results with proper citations in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.
    112 npm
    23
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A local-first MCP server that lets AI agents read any webpage as clean Markdown, crawl whole sites within configured limits, search without API keys, and solve supported captchas locally — all without cloud services or third-party keys.
    30
    18
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A fault-tolerant, stealth-enabled Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for web searching and content fetching. Built for AI Agents (Cursor, Claude Code, OpenCode), it uses a stealth browser engine to fetch pages, dynamically handles SPAs/React, and converts bloat into token-optimized Markdown.
    2
    44 npm
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    MCP server enabling local-first web search, fetch, extract, and caching with citeable excerpts, no API key required. Supports research workflows for agents and apps.
    301 npm
    1
    MIT

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Scored across 20 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, and descriptions explicitly guide when to use each (e.g., audit_page vs. specialized tools). However, some overlap exists (e.g., multiple scoring tools, aggregate vs. specific audits) which could cause minor confusion.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tools follow a mix of verb_noun (audit_page, check_robots) and noun_verb (pricing_generate, report_save) patterns. While readable, this inconsistency slightly reduces predictability.

Tool Count4/5

20 tools is a reasonably large set but appropriate for the comprehensive SEO audit domain. Each tool covers a distinct aspect (pages, sitemaps, robots, schema, scoring, rewriting), and no clearly redundant tools exist.

Completeness4/5

The set covers most essential read-only audit operations for SEO and AI readiness. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for checking SSL or speed), but the domain is well-addressed with tools for auditing, scoring, rewriting, and generating standard files.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessWithin a week