Skip to main content
Glama
AutomateLab-tech

automatelab-ai-seo

Official
by AutomateLab-tech
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussions(1)Admin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to automatelab-ai-seo

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Nexus MCP Server

      adawalli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready Model Context Protocol server that brings AI-powered web search directly into development environments, providing intelligent search results with proper citations in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client.
      106 npm
      23
      MIT

    • MCP Server for Stealth Web

      maxylev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A fault-tolerant, stealth-enabled Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for web searching and content fetching. Built for AI Agents (Cursor, Claude Code, OpenCode), it uses a stealth browser engine to fetch pages, dynamically handles SPAs/React, and converts bloat into token-optimized Markdown.
      2
      33 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Lookout

      SylphxAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server enabling local-first web search, fetch, extract, and caching with citeable excerpts, no API key required. Supports research workflows for agents and apps.
      16 npm
      MIT

    • Parkour MCP

      blightbow
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A content exploration MCP server that helps LLMs surface high-signal, unsummarized web content through clean APIs and Markdown conversion, with intelligent frontmatter steering and citation tracking.
      13
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, and descriptions explicitly guide when to use each (e.g., audit_page vs. specialized tools). However, some overlap exists (e.g., multiple scoring tools, aggregate vs. specific audits) which could cause minor confusion.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tools follow a mix of verb_noun (audit_page, check_robots) and noun_verb (pricing_generate, report_save) patterns. While readable, this inconsistency slightly reduces predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    20 tools is a reasonably large set but appropriate for the comprehensive SEO audit domain. Each tool covers a distinct aspect (pages, sitemaps, robots, schema, scoring, rewriting), and no clearly redundant tools exist.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers most essential read-only audit operations for SEO and AI readiness. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for checking SSL or speed), but the domain is well-addressed with tools for auditing, scoring, rewriting, and generating standard files.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources