browser_navigate
Navigate to any web URL to automate page interaction, capture screenshots, and execute JavaScript in a real browser environment.
Instructions
Navigate to a URL
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes |
Navigate to any web URL to automate page interaction, capture screenshots, and execute JavaScript in a real browser environment.
Navigate to a URL
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as page load behavior, error handling, or side effects. The agent has no insight into what happens after navigation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise, but this comes at the cost of informativeness. It is appropriately brief for a simple action but could include key details without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It lacks information on return behavior, failure scenarios, or state changes, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the 'url' parameter beyond its type. It does not clarify required format, protocol, or any validation rules.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Navigate to a URL' clearly states the action (navigate) and resource (URL), and it distinguishes from sibling tools like click or fill. However, it lacks additional context that could further clarify its purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It is implied that it is used for navigation, but no exclusions or context-sensitive advice is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Automata-Labs-team/MCP-Server-Playwright'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server