Skip to main content
Glama

search_device_510k

Retrieve FDA 510(k) clearance records for medical devices using parameters such as device name, applicant, product code, and decision date range.

Instructions

Search FDA 510(k) device clearances

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
device_nameNoName of the medical device
applicantNoApplicant company name
contactNoContact information
product_codeNoFDA product code
clearance_typeNoType of 510(k) clearance
decision_date_fromNoStart date for decision date range (YYYYMMDD format)
decision_date_toNoEnd date for decision date range (YYYYMMDD format)
limitNoMaximum number of results to return (1-100)
skipNoNumber of results to skip for pagination
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but only says 'Search'. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication needs, rate limits, response format, or pagination behavior, leaving the agent underinformed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a simple search tool, though it could be front-loaded with the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 9 parameters and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not explain what a 510(k) clearance is, how to best use the filters, or what the results look like, leaving gaps in understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions, so no additional value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Search' and the resource 'FDA 510(k) device clearances', which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like search_device_adverse_events or search_device_recalls.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no context on prerequisites or typical use cases. The description lacks any when-to-use or when-not-to-use information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Augmented-Nature/OpenFDA-MCP-Server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server