atlasent-mcp
Official@atlasent/mcp-server
MCP server that enforces authorize-before-execute for any MCP-compatible AI agent.
Authorization for consequential AI-agent actions at the execution boundary.
AtlaSent performs execution-time authorization: determine whether a specific consequential Action is authorized now, issue a bounded Permit on allow, verify that Permit at the execution Gate, and only then allow the governed native effect.
A plausible request is not organizational authority.
This MCP server exposes AtlaSent authorization primitives to Model Context Protocol hosts and includes a protected deployment demo that proves the ordering end to end.
The invariant
For an enforced protected path:
Action proposed
→ current organizational Authority + Policy + Context evaluated
→ Decision
deny / hold / escalate → STOP
allow → bounded Permit
→ Permit Verification at the execution Gate
invalid / expired / replayed / mismatched / error → STOP
verified → native effect may execute
→ execution/native-effect Evidence recorded where the integration supplies itEvaluation is not execution. A positive Decision is not the Gate. Permit Verification happens before the protected side effect.
Install
npm install @atlasent/mcp-serverOr run the local demo:
git clone https://github.com/AtlaSent-Systems-Inc/atlasent-mcp-server.git
cd atlasent-mcp-server
npm install
npm run build
npm run demoLocal mode is a development/demo convenience. Its in-process policy engine and local Permit format are not a substitute for a deployed, accepted customer enforcement topology.
Canon-backed Actions
AtlaSent does not treat every ad-hoc tool string as a new governed Action Type.
Use the Protected Action Canon for stable Action identity. Two important examples are:
production.deploy
agent.tool.invokeFor a generic AI tool invocation, use agent.tool.invoke as the public Canon-backed Action Type and carry tool-specific facts—tool name, target, environment, arguments/payload digest, resource state, and other required context—in the authorization context or binding fields supported by the selected integration path.
Use the read-only atlasent_lookup_action tool to discover Canon-backed Action Types instead of inventing a parallel taxonomy.
Authority is not Approval
Keep the concepts separate:
Authority — standing, scoped organizational right to cause a class of change.
Authorization — per-request determination whether this exact Action may proceed now.
Policy — versioned conditions applied to the determination.
Approval — verified input that may satisfy a Policy condition; not standing Authority and not the final Authorization result.
Decision —
allow | deny | hold | escalateat the platform boundary.Permit — bounded positive-Authorization artifact.
Verification — execution-boundary check of the Permit and applicable bindings.
Execution / native effect — what the underlying tool or system actually does.
Evidence / Proof — durable evidence of the authorization and, where observed, the effect/result.
A human Approval, favorable risk signal, policy match, deployment ticket, or workflow status does not by itself become organizational Authority.
Protected-tool demo
deploy_service is intentionally small. It demonstrates a two-layer protected path:
agent requests deploy_service
→ authorize internal agent-tool compatibility gate
→ verify outer Permit
→ authorize production.deploy
→ verify production.deploy Permit
→ simulated deployment effectThe internal outer gate uses the Canon-backed agent.tool.invoke Action (CANON-000026 / ACT-0029) — the same public identifier documented throughout the AtlaSent ecosystem as the canonical generic AI-agent tool invocation. It previously used a legacy, uncatalogued identity, model.agent.execute_tool, which had no corresponding action_classes provisioning path in the runtime (no seed/migration anywhere creates a row with that slug) — so against a real, unmodified AtlaSent org the outer gate could only ever return NO_ACTION_CLASS deny, regardless of the tool-specific inner gate's own decision. Migrating the outer gate onto agent.tool.invoke gives it the real "AI Agent Safeguard" provisioning path (atlasent-api's seed_ai_agent_safeguard_fn.sql / provision-agent-pilot-org.sql) that already exists for exactly this purpose. See AtlaSent-Systems-Inc/atlasent-mcp-server#121 for the full investigation and decision record.
If either Decision is non-allow or either Permit fails Verification, no deployment result is produced.
The protected-tool response includes the action-specific Verification result alongside the simulated native result:
{
"decision": "allow",
"permit_token": "...",
"verification": {
"outcome": "verified",
"valid": true
},
"result": {
"status": "deployed",
"service": "billing-api"
}
}The returned Permit has already been consumed by the execution-boundary Verification. Verifying it again should be treated as a replay, not as a step required after deployment.
Self-gating agent pattern
For an agent or MCP host that owns its own native tool boundary, the safe pattern is:
const decision = await evaluate({
action_type: "agent.tool.invoke",
actor_id: "agent:research-bot",
environment: "production",
});
if (decision.decision !== "allow") {
throw new Error("Action is not authorized");
}
const verification = await verify_permit({
permit_token: decision.permit_token,
action_type: "agent.tool.invoke",
actor_id: "agent:research-bot",
environment: "production",
// Present target_id / payload_hash when the selected authorization path
// binds those fields.
});
if (!verification.valid) {
throw new Error("Permit did not verify");
}
// Only now may the protected native effect occur.
const result = await runProtectedTool();A wrapper, decorator, prompt, or MCP tool definition is not automatically a non-bypassable Gate. The enforcement claim belongs to the actual topology: the native effect must be unreachable through the claimed protected path unless required Authorization and Permit Verification succeeded.
Core tools
evaluate
Simple local/remote authorization helper for MCP hosts.
Input: { action_type, actor_id, environment, approvals?, change_window? }
Output: { decision: "allow" | "deny" | "hold", permit_token?, ... }On allow, do not execute yet. Present the Permit to verify_permit at the execution boundary first.
verify_permit
Execution-boundary verification helper.
Input: {
permit_token,
action_type,
actor_id,
environment,
approvals?,
change_window?,
target_id?,
payload_hash?
}
Output: { outcome: "verified" | "expired" | "invalid" | "error", valid, ... }Proceed only when valid === true. Successful Verification consumes a single-use Permit where that contract applies.
deploy_service
Protected deployment demonstration. It performs the necessary Authorization and Verification internally before producing its simulated deployment result.
atlasent_evaluate / atlasent_verify_permit
Hosted V1 API-facing tools. Use the richer remote evaluation path when you need additional context beyond the small evaluate demo envelope. Verification remains an execution-boundary operation.
atlasent_lookup_action
Read-only Canon lookup for Action Types, gate flags, authorization patterns, evidence requirements, and graph relationships.
atlasent_atlas_lookup
Read-only lookup of canonical AtlaSent concepts such as Authority, Policy, Decision, Permit, Verification, Evidence, Gate, and Trust Root.
atlasent_integrity_audit
Read-only audit of the organization's Authority graph for internal inconsistency. Hosted mode only; the organization is derived server-side from the API key.
Input: { decision_window_days? } // 1-3650; omit to let the server choose
Output: the integrity report, verbatimThis is not a pass/fail health check, and the tool adds no verdict of its own. Each finding carries a three-way classification:
| How to read it |
| A genuine inconsistency in the Authority graph. |
| Frequently the correct, healthy state — e.g. an expired grant that is supposed to be expired. Not a failure. |
| The proposition could not be verified. Never treat it as clean; "could not check" and "checked and found nothing" are different facts. |
Read summary.audited_scope before concluding anything from an empty findings list — a short decision window is not an absence of findings. If the audit cannot complete, the server refuses rather than returning a partial report, and this tool surfaces that as an error rather than an empty report.
The server also exposes policy, permit, approval, evidence, compliance, trajectory, and VQP tools. Use MCP tools/list for the exact tool inventory supported by the installed version.
Approval workflow
Approval can be required, but resolving an Approval is not equivalent to executing the protected Action.
Approval / Assertion collected
→ current Authorization / reevaluation path
→ Decision
→ Permit on allow
→ Verification
→ native effectUse atlasent_create_approval_request and atlasent_resolve_approval_request to manage approval inputs. The protected Action must still satisfy the current authorization path and execution-boundary Verification before proceeding.
Execution evidence
atlasent_record_execution_evaluation records an observed execution outcome after the native effect. That evidence function does not replace pre-execution Permit Verification.
Keep these statements distinct:
an
allowDecision proves a positive authorization determination was made;a verified Permit proves the bounded authorization artifact passed its Gate checks at that point in time;
execution/native-effect evidence is what supports a claim that the underlying action actually occurred.
Local vs remote mode
Mode | Purpose |
| Development/demo/CI using the small in-process rules engine. |
| Calls the configured AtlaSent hosted/runtime API. |
Remote example:
ATLASENT_MODE=remote \
ATLASENT_API_KEY=ask_live_xxx \
ATLASENT_BASE_URL=https://api.atlasent.io/functions/v1 \
ATLASENT_MCP_READONLY=1 \
npx @atlasent/mcp-serverATLASENT_BASE_URL defaults to https://api.atlasent.io/functions/v1 — this is the
correct base for the core evaluate / verify_permit / atlasent_evaluate path and
for other dash-form direct endpoints (/v1-evaluate, /v1-verify-permit,
/v1-authority-intelligence/...). The generic REST tools (policies, permits, audit
events, webhooks, SCIM, SIEM, evidence exports, approval requests) are served at the
gateway/API domain root under slash-form paths (/v1/policies, /v1/permits, ...);
the server automatically strips the /functions/v1 suffix for those calls, so a
single ATLASENT_BASE_URL value works for both families — no separate configuration
needed.
Read-only mode for live demos
Set:
ATLASENT_MCP_READONLY=1to prevent registration of mutating administrative tools during a live-API demo. Read-only mode does not turn the server into a universal security boundary; it reduces the exposed mutation surface. The protected execution path still depends on the Authorization and Verification topology described above.
Fail-closed behavior
For a path that is configured to require AtlaSent Authorization and Permit Verification, treat these as block conditions:
non-allow Decision;
missing required Permit;
authentication/API failure;
invalid, expired, revoked, replayed, or binding-mismatched Permit;
Verification error;
missing required execution binding.
Shadow/advisory evaluation is useful for observation, but it is not the same as enforced execution protection.
Claude Desktop
{
"mcpServers": {
"atlasent": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@atlasent/mcp-server"],
"env": {
"ATLASENT_MODE": "remote",
"ATLASENT_API_KEY": "ask_live_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"ATLASENT_BASE_URL": "https://api.atlasent.io/functions/v1",
"ATLASENT_MCP_READONLY": "1"
}
}
}
}Cursor
Add to .cursor/mcp.json (project) or ~/.cursor/mcp.json (global):
{
"mcpServers": {
"atlasent": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@atlasent/mcp-server"],
"env": {
"ATLASENT_MODE": "remote",
"ATLASENT_API_KEY": "ask_live_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"ATLASENT_BASE_URL": "https://api.atlasent.io/functions/v1",
"ATLASENT_MCP_READONLY": "1"
}
}
}
}Windsurf
Add to ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"atlasent": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@atlasent/mcp-server"],
"env": {
"ATLASENT_MODE": "remote",
"ATLASENT_API_KEY": "ask_live_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"ATLASENT_BASE_URL": "https://api.atlasent.io/functions/v1",
"ATLASENT_MCP_READONLY": "1"
}
}
}
}Other MCP clients
The same server can be configured in any other MCP-compatible host using its normal MCP server configuration mechanism (command: npx, args: ["-y", "@atlasent/mcp-server"], and the same env block shown above).
This server is also distributed via the official MCP Registry (io.github.atlasent-systems-inc/mcp-server, manifest at server.json) and Smithery (config at smithery.yaml) — a registry- or Smithery-aware host can discover and install it without a hand-written config block.
Development
npm install
npm run typecheck
npm test
npm run build
npm run demonpm test includes regression tests proving that the protected deployment demo does not produce a native result when either the outer agent-tool Permit or the action-specific deployment Permit fails Verification.
Security
Do not place API keys, signing material, customer secrets, or production credentials in source control. Limit authorization context to facts required by the selected policy and bindings.
Security-sensitive integrations must place the actual side effect after the required Authorization and Verification checks in control flow. Logging a Decision and then executing anyway is not enforcement.
Related public components
atlasent-sdk— language SDKsatlasent-action— GitHub Actions integrationatlasent-verify— offline evidence verifieratlasent-keys— public verification material
License
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AtlaSent-Systems-Inc/atlasent-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server