Skip to main content
Glama
Atharva-Jayappa

blast-scope-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to blast-scope-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to assess the risk of shell commands before execution, providing a probability of harm and a suggested action (auto, warn, or confirm).
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Offline server that explains any shell command token-by-token and flags destructive ones (rm -rf /, curl | sudo bash, dd/mkfs/shred to a disk device, chmod -R 777 /) — a safety gate for agentic shell execution.
      3
      2,422 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that vets LLM-emitted shell commands BEFORE execution — detects rm -rf nested deep in chains, package-manager glob removal (apt remove 'nvidia'), dd/mkfs filesystem destruction, chmod 777 / chown -R privilege blast, network-exfil via curl | bash, chained shutdown/reboot, git destructive ops. 30 detection rules across 8 families. Sub-second, local, free, MCP-native.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Advanced shell command execution for AI agents — a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server with security policy engine, process lifecycle management, bounded output capture, POSIX signals, and token-efficient responses.
      6
      2
      Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides secure, sandboxed terminal access for AI assistants via the Model Context Protocol, with multi-layer risk analysis and auditable command execution.
      7 npm
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: assessing commands, rebuilding the graph, listing snapshots, and restoring them. No functional overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores (assess_command, index_project, list_snapshots, restore_snapshot).

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools cover the essential operations on the blast radius domain without redundancy or missing core functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers assessment, graph indexing, and snapshot retrieval/restoration. Snapshot lifecycle management (e.g., deletion) is not exposed, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues