Skip to main content
Glama
Atharva-Jayappa

blast-scope-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to blast-scope-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to assess the risk of shell commands before execution, providing a probability of harm and a suggested action (auto, warn, or confirm).
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Offline server that explains any shell command token-by-token and flags destructive ones (rm -rf /, curl | sudo bash, dd/mkfs/shred to a disk device, chmod -R 777 /) — a safety gate for agentic shell execution.
      3
      111 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to execute bash and subprocess commands through a zero-dependency sandbox guard that blocks destructive system mutations, path traversals, reverse shells, and other unsafe execution patterns.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to score, inspect, and gate tool calls before they execute, resolving shell commands the way a shell would in order to block destructive actions and detect multi-step attack sequences. It also redacts credentials and PII in either direction, requires signed single-use approval tokens for high-impact actions, and keeps a tamper-evident audit trail.
      6
      70 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that vets LLM-emitted shell commands BEFORE execution — detects rm -rf nested deep in chains, package-manager glob removal (apt remove 'nvidia'), dd/mkfs filesystem destruction, chmod 777 / chown -R privilege blast, network-exfil via curl | bash, chained shutdown/reboot, git destructive ops. 30 detection rules across 8 families. Sub-second, local, free, MCP-native.
      3
      53 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: assessing commands, rebuilding the graph, listing snapshots, and restoring them. No functional overlap exists.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores (assess_command, index_project, list_snapshots, restore_snapshot).

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools cover the essential operations on the blast radius domain without redundancy or missing core functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers assessment, graph indexing, and snapshot retrieval/restoration. Snapshot lifecycle management (e.g., deletion) is not exposed, but the core workflow is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues