Skip to main content
Glama

set_datetime_index

Set a datetime column as the DataFrame index for time-series resampling. Automatically sorts by index.

Instructions

Set a datetime column as the DataFrame index. Set datetime column as DataFrame index. Required for time-series resampling. Sorts by index automatically. Example: set_datetime_index(column="date")

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
columnYes
df_nameNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses a behavioral trait: 'Sorts by index automatically.' However, it does not explain whether the operation mutates the dataframe in-place, returns a new dataframe, or how the target dataframe is identified (e.g., via df_name). Missing these side-effect details leaves ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first two sentences are redundant: 'Set a datetime column as the DataFrame index. Set datetime column as DataFrame index.' This wastes space. The rest (resampling requirement, auto-sort, example) is informative, but the redundancy prevents a higher score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations and an output schema that is not described, the description should provide enough context to invoke it correctly. It fails to explain the role of df_name, the return value, or side effects on the dataframe. This is a significant gap for a tool that modifies dataframe state.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It clarifies the 'column' parameter by specifying it must be a datetime column and provides an example, but it says nothing about 'df_name' at all. This leaves one of two parameters undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action: 'Set a datetime column as the DataFrame index.' It also adds context by mentioning that it sorts automatically and is required for time-series resampling, distinguishing it from sibling tools that perform other dataframe operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear use case: 'Required for time-series resampling.' It does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, but none of the sibling tools appear to serve this specific index-setting purpose, so the context is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AstyanM/mcp-data-science'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server