Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
AstraxOf

Web MCP Bridge

by AstraxOf
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Web MCP Bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • WebMCP

      lossefanya
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables browser-based AI chat interfaces to use local MCP tools by injecting a tool-call protocol into the page and executing approved filesystem, shell, and downstream MCP tool calls from a local daemon.
      465 npm
      MIT

    • browserpilot-mcp

      Fire162
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables remote AI agents to control a local, authenticated desktop browser over MCP through an outbound WebSocket bridge and Chrome extension, supporting tab management, navigation, page reading, clicking, typing, scrolling, screenshots, and JavaScript evaluation.
      1
      MIT

    • VerityMCP

      tanishqbaweja
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects ChatGPT Web chat directly to a local computer, enabling verified file editing, terminal command execution, Playwright browser automation, code intelligence, and desktop control through the Model Context Protocol. Every operation is backed by pre- and post-condition checks such as SHA-256 byte readback and live DOM validation, so agents can trust that reported successes actually happened.
      64 npm
      1
      MIT

    • AKIMCP

      tomaszfontaine36
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables web-based AI chat clients such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Grok to operate a user's local machine through a single OAuth-gated, whitelist-protected MCP endpoint exposing tools for file editing, shell commands, search, Git, SQLite, browser automation, DevTools, background tasks, localhost service fetching, clipboard, notifications, ports, and Postman control.
      -

    • AKIMCP

      OlivierOrlov
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes a governed suite of 38 tools over a single OAuth-gated MCP endpoint, letting web-based AI chat clients read and edit local files, run whitelisted shell commands, search, use Git, inspect SQLite databases, and drive browser, DevTools, clipboard, and background-task workflows. It requires no system-wide install or admin rights and restricts access to folders and commands approved from a local control panel.
      MIT

    • byob

      Weber822
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding tools to control your real, already-logged-in Chrome browser through local MCP tools for navigation, reading, screenshots, form filling, cookies, tabs, network inspection, and more. It works via a Chrome extension rather than a remote-debugging port, keeping all communication on your machine.
      1 npm
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a completely distinct purpose: system info, current time, arithmetic addition, and text echo. There is essentially no way to confuse them, and descriptions reinforce the boundaries clearly.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names are lowercase snake_case, which is consistent, but they mix noun-style names (info_sistema, hora_actual, eco) with verb-style names (sumar), so there is no predictable verb_noun pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    Four tools is a reasonable count, but they read as demo/smoke-test utilities rather than a scoped toolset for a 'Web MCP Bridge.' The surface feels thin and trivial rather than purposeful.

    Completeness2/5

    The tools are disconnected demo primitives (echo, sumar, hora_actual, info_sistema) with no coherent domain lifecycle or CRUD coverage. For a bridge server, there are no meaningful bridge operations, leaving significant functional gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources