ffmpeg-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to ffmpeg-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server exposing headless ffmpeg operations for video, audio, and image processing via auto-generated typed tools, enabling agentic media file manipulation.GPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA lightweight server that exposes FFmpeg's video processing capabilities to AI assistants through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), supporting operations like video format conversion, audio extraction, and adding watermarks.89 npm25MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to perform FFmpeg operations like clipping, merging, extracting audio, adding subtitles, and transcoding videos via a set of tools exposed as an MCP server.58MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes FFmpeg as structured tools for AI-agent-driven video editing, enabling operations like trimming, subtitling, and transcoding via natural language.144 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes FFmpeg as a structured tool set for AI agents, enabling timeline-based video editing, preview, rendering, and analysis with an optional LLM autopilot.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to programmatically edit videos via FFmpeg, providing tools for probing, trimming, concatenating, timeline composition, LUT generation/application, rendering, and edit verification over MCP.162MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct operation: extraction (audio, thumbnail, keyframes), transformation (convert, compress, speed, aspect ratio, split-screen), audio processing (normalize, trim_silence), and assembly (concat, overlay, subtitles). The few potentially confusable pairs—extract_thumbnail vs extract_keyframes, add_subtitles vs burn_subtitles, trim_media vs trim_silence—are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions. An agent should reliably pick the right tool.
Strong snake_case verb_noun convention throughout (extract_audio, compress_video, trim_silence, add_overlay, concat_media). The only deviations are the resource-prefixed names media_convert and media_probe, which put the noun first, but they remain readable and predictable within the pattern.
17 tools is on the high side of the ideal 3-15 band but well justified for a media-manipulation domain with many independent operations. Each tool covers a genuinely distinct capability, so nothing feels padded, though the surface is nearing the point where discoverability could suffer.
The surface covers the core media lifecycle: probe, trim, trim silence, compress, convert, audio extract/normalize, subtitles, overlays, overlays/speed/concat, and vertical-format output. Minor gaps exist for rotation/flip, arbitrary cropping or resolution scaling as a standalone tool, and multi-audio-track mixing, but these are workaroundable.