jio_list_albums

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of safety and behavioral disclosure. It clarifies the meaning of the two kinds and the default root, but does not mention pagination behavior, return format, or any side effects. Since this is a read-only listing operation, the omission of explicit read-only guidance is notable but not critical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, starts with the core action, and provides essential detail without unnecessary wordiness. Every sentence earns its place, making it highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple listing tool, the description covers the key distinctions between folder and board, but it lacks details about pagination (limit/nextLink) and the expected return structure. Given that no output schema exists, the description should have provided a bit more on what the response contains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25% (only parentId has a description). The description compensates by explaining the kind parameter in detail and noting the default root for parentId, but it does not explain limit or nextLink. This is partial compensation for a low-coverage schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'List albums' and differentiates between kind=folder and kind=board, with a clear explanation of what each kind represents. This provides a specific verb+resource and distinguishes the tool from sibling operations like jio_create_album or jio_delete_album.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use each kind (folder for organizing media, board for native albums) and notes the default root for parentId. It gives context for usage but does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use this tool, such as the need for pagination with nextLink.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.