mcp-jumpserver-gui-sucks
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-jumpserver-gui-sucks
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for SSH connections through JumpServer, supporting persistent sessions, multiple bastions, and hot-reload configuration.7MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAggregates MCP tools from AT series IDE plugins into a single server, routing calls to plugin bridges for SSH, JumpServer, and more.1-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAgent-native SSH control plane with a local Web Terminal, human-in-the-loop secret input, keychain-backed profiles, and user-confirmed uploads for Codex, Claude Code, and MCP-compatible coding agents.181Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA lightweight, zero-agent SSH operations tool that enables remote command execution, file transfer, and audit logging. It integrates as an MCP server for AI-driven infrastructure management.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agent clients to safely connect to tools and execution resources through MCP with authorization, approvals, audit, chat-context isolation, SSH/Docker access, and long-running command session tracking.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that acts as a boundary agent, giving LLMs and automation systems controlled SSH-based access to remote machines for tasks like administration, diagnostics, and security research.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 37 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct resource/action—asset discovery, token lifecycle, terminal session control, or SFTP operations—and even close pairs like probe vs acquire and send_input vs run_command have clearly separated scopes. No two tools appear interchangeable.
The jms_ prefix is used uniformly, and most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern like list_, get_, create_, acquire_, and close_. A few noun-only names such as jms_paths, jms_status, jms_profile, and the two usage_guide tools break the verb convention, but the overall pattern remains predictable.
At 37 tools, the set exceeds the practical count threshold and will make agent tool selection heavier than necessary. The many terminal and SFTP operations are individually useful, but some session-control and usage-guide tools could have been consolidated.
The tool surface covers the full JumpServer workflow for coding agents: environment/profile discovery, asset and access lookup, connection-token lifecycle, managed KoKo terminal operations, and SFTP file handling. Cleanup operations like expire, close, and exit also prevent dead ends.