Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-ebook-read

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets an LLM browse, search, and download books from OPDS catalogs (e.g., Project Gutenberg, Standard Ebooks) using tools for feed navigation, full-text search, and acquisition link downloads.
      4
      1
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that ingests PDFs, extracts structure, and provides semantic search and sequential navigation tools for AI clients to query and learn from documents.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that extracts text-layer content from PDF files, enabling AI agents to inspect, extract text, outlines, and page content.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear separation between library-level, document-level, and component-level operations (e.g., library_explore vs. document_explore, pdf_list_figures vs. pdf_list_tables). Overlap is minimal and resolved by descriptive names and context.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools follow a consistent snake_case with domain prefixes (document_, library_, pdf_, epub_, storage_, eval_), and most use a verb_noun pattern. Minor variations like 'doctor_health_check' and 'get_outline' vs. 'read_outline_node' break perfect uniformity but remain predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 29 tools, the set exceeds the 25-tool threshold for 'too many'. While the domain is complex, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., combining pdf_list_figures/images/tables into a single listing tool with type parameter), making the surface overly large for agents.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle: library scanning, document ingest, exploration, component-level reading (figures, tables, etc.), storage maintenance, and evaluation. Minor gaps exist, like no direct tool for top-level document metadata retrieval, but core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues