gmail-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to gmail-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables reading, sending, archiving, and managing Gmail emails and labels through Google OAuth authentication, acting as an OAuth proxy to the Gmail API.89 npm11MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Gmail through the Gmail API with OAuth2 authentication. Supports reading, sending, searching emails, and managing read status through natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Gmail through natural language, supporting email sending/reading, searching, draft management, label organization, and batch operations with secure OAuth authentication.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to send, search, and read emails via Gmail using OAuth2 authentication.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Gmail emails, including sending, searching, and organizing with labels and attachments via OAuth2.43 npm1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive Gmail management through the Gmail API, including sending/receiving emails, organizing labels and threads, managing drafts, and configuring account settings with secure OAuth2 authentication.64695 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct Gmail resource and action: searching, fetching a message, fetching a thread, creating a draft, and listing labels. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
All tool names follow a uniform `gmail_<verb>_<noun>` pattern (search, get_message, get_thread, create_draft, list_labels). The naming is fully consistent and predictable.
Five tools is a well-scoped size for a focused Gmail integration covering search, read, drafts, and labels. The count feels intentional rather than sparse or bloated.
The set covers search, retrieval, thread viewing, draft creation, and label listing, but lacks common Gmail operations like sending, updating/deleting drafts, modifying labels on messages, or marking read/unread. The read-and-draft focus is coherent, but the domain is only partially covered.