Skip to main content
Glama
ArsNovaSingers

ars-nova-wordpress-mcp

Official

Delete Menu Item

wp_delete_menu_item
DestructiveIdempotent

Permanently delete a WordPress menu item by ID, requiring admin privileges. Choose markdown or JSON output format.

Instructions

Permanently remove a single menu item (force delete). Requires admin.

Args:

  • item_id (number): Menu-item ID to remove.

  • response_format (enum): markdown | json.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
item_idYesMenu-item ID to delete.
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' for human-readable, 'json' for machine-readable.markdown
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, but the description adds 'force delete' and 'Permanently remove', clarifying the nature of the deletion beyond a generic destroy. It also discloses the admin permission requirement. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, with a clear front-loaded purpose, followed by a compact list of args. Every sentence adds value, and there is no fluff or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a simple delete operation with no output schema and good annotations, the description covers essential aspects: scope, permanence, permission requirement, and parameters. It lacks details like return success indication or error handling, but these are not critical for this type of tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description simply restates the parameter names and descriptions already present in the schema. It adds no extra meaning beyond what the structured fields already provide, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Permanently remove a single menu item (force delete)', specifying the verb (remove), resource (menu item), and scope (single). It distinguishes from sibling tools like wp_delete_menu, which deletes a whole menu, by explicitly limiting to a single item.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear context for use ('Requires admin') and indicates the operation is a permanent force delete. However, it does not explicitly mention when NOT to use this tool or name alternative tools, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ArsNovaSingers/ars-nova-wordpress-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server