Skip to main content
Glama
Arookie127

cad-mcp

by Arookie127
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to cad-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • gemini-cad-mcp

      ssfdre38
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multimodal AI to convert photos with reference objects into parametric OpenSCAD models and watertight 3D-printable STL files, including calibration, part generation, and printability inspection.
      7
      MIT

    • fcgen-mcp

      kouya-group
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to safely generate parametric CAD parts (STEP/STL) using verified templates and FreeCAD, with validation and assembly support.
      MIT

    • openscad-mcp

      petrijr
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes OpenSCAD CLI as MCP tools for validating, rendering, and exporting parametric 3D models. Enables LLM clients to interactively create and manipulate OpenSCAD designs.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three build/inspect verbs are well-separated: make_part (library parts) vs make_lattice (free-form SDF) vs list_parts (discovery). check_mesh, look_at_mesh, and describe_model overlap somewhat (all report topology/bbox), but their descriptions clearly split numeric evidence, visual rendering, and parameter recall.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all names follow a verb_object snake_case pattern (list_parts, make_part, check_mesh, export_mesh, describe_model). The sole deviation is look_at_mesh, which inserts a preposition but remains easily readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a model-build-inspect-export workflow; each tool covers a distinct stage and none feels redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers discovery, two build paths, numeric and visual verification, export, and parameter recall. Minor gaps: no delete_model, no list_models to enumerate session models, and no pure edit/parameter-update tool, though rebuilding via make_part/make_lattice can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources