Skip to main content
Glama
Arnon-hs
by Arnon-hs

Related Servers

Alternatives to AtlasRepo MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to a local-first catalog of portable agent skills, exposing tools to discover ranked matches, inspect stored artifacts, traverse declared relationships, and view configuration.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for agents and humans, with ranked lexical retrieval, exact query, document handles, symbol context, and change impact analysis.
      42 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read access to community-written summaries, scores, and reviews of open-source repositories via the RepoCritics corpus. Enables search and retrieval of wiki pages, reviews, metadata, and AI reports for repositories.
      7
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only hybrid RAG search and discovery over a local-first AI knowledge corpus, enabling semantic and keyword search, browse, digest, and status tools.
      4
      PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: atlasrepo_recommend is problem-driven, atlasrepo_search_tools is structured query-based, and atlasrepo_get_repository is a targeted detail fetch. However, recommend and search_tools could both return repositories/tools, so an agent might occasionally be unsure which path to use for discovery.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the atlasrepo_ prefix and use a verb-first style. atlasrepo_search_tools and atlasrepo_get_repository follow a clear verb_noun pattern, but atlasrepo_recommend lacks an object, creating a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for this domain: one for problem-level recommendation, one for structured search, and one for inspecting a specific repository record. Each tool covers a distinct part of the workflow without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only decision-record workflow is well covered: discover by problem, search by criteria, and load detailed evidence for a repository. Minor gaps include no explicit list-all/browse capability or a dedicated workflow-detail fetch, but these are workable through the existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues