No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool owns a clearly distinct job: resolving entities, listing filings, pulling a single financial time series, extracting a filing section, searching full text, and comparing companies. The only adjacent pair is compare_companies and get_financial_concept, but the former is explicitly a multi-company alignment tool while the latter is a single-company series, and both descriptions make the boundary clear.
All six tool names follow the same verb_noun snake_case pattern: resolve_company, list_filings, get_financial_concept, get_filing_section, search_full_text, compare_companies. There is no mixing of camelCase, inconsistent verb forms, or vague tool names.
Six tools is right-sized for an EDGAR client, with each tool mapping to a distinct step in the workflow: resolve, browse filings, read numbers, read prose, search, and compare. None feels redundant, and the set is neither too thin nor bloated.
The set covers the core EDGAR workflow well, including entity resolution, filing discovery, XBRL figures, narrative sections, and cross-filing search. Minor gaps remain—there is no tool for fetching an entire raw filing body, and get_financial_concept supports a fixed concept list rather than arbitrary XBRL tags—but these are workaroundable through document URLs and the available extraction tools.
