GNS3 NetForge MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to GNS3 NetForge MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables control of GNS3 network lab automation, including projects, nodes, consoles, and SSH, through Claude Desktop or any MCP-compatible client.1584 PyPI15MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered network engineering by providing natural language control over GNS3 network simulations. Supports creating projects, building network topologies, managing devices, controlling simulations, and analyzing network traffic through conversational AI interactions.4225MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control GNS3 network emulation labs. Supports building topologies, managing devices, capturing packets, and automating device CLIs.100MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to manage network topologies, labs, nodes, and configurations in the EVE-NG network emulation platform through a standardized interface.2615-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients like Claude Desktop and Cursor to control Cisco Packet Tracer through natural language, including generating network topologies, running device configurations, and managing simulations.23MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables programmatic control of a PNETLab network-emulation lab via natural language, allowing users to build topologies, wire links, push device configs, and boot the lab through an LLM agent.314Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools map to distinct resources (project, node, link, drawing, project_docs) or distinct access methods (ssh, console, http_client), and the ssh/console split is explicitly explained. The main overlap is query_resource, a 'universal' tool whose read purpose duplicates the list actions of project/node/link/drawing, which could cause misselection.
All names use snake_case, and the CRUD-style tools consistently use bare resource nouns (project, node, link, drawing, tftp). A few deviation tools use verb phrases (query_resource, export_topology_diagram, search_tools), but the convention remains readable and predictable.
15 tools is well-scoped for a full GNS3 lab-management server, and each tool covers a meaningful, non-redundant slice (topology CRUD, device access, file transfer, docs, discovery). Nothing feels padded or missing at the count level.
The surface is broad: project/node/link/drawing CRUD, console+SSH device access, file and TFTP management, docs, notifications, topology export, and tool discovery. Minor gaps exist — no snapshot management (only referenced via events), no template CRUD, and no project delete — but core workflows are covered.