Skip to main content
Glama
ArmandSwirc

TimeChimp MCP Server

by ArmandSwirc
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to TimeChimp MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kingtime

      sietzekeuning
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to log and manage time entries, control timers, review unbilled hours, and prepare draft Moneybird invoices through natural language.
      1
      MIT

    • Tripletex MCP Server

      adriantr
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with the Tripletex accounting API to manage time tracking, projects, and timesheet approvals through natural language. It also supports searching and managing outgoing invoices and processing supplier invoice approvals.
      31
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 46 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. Tools are organized by resource type (contact, customer, expense, etc.) and action (create, get, update, delete), making it easy to tell them apart. The only potential overlap is between general update tools and specific status update tools, but their descriptions clarify the distinction.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout. All tools use snake_case with clear action prefixes (create_, get_, update_, delete_) followed by the resource name, with occasional modifiers like _by_id or _status_history. There are no deviations in naming conventions.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 46 tools, the count is excessive for most MCP server purposes. While TimeChimp appears to be a comprehensive time tracking/expense management system, this many tools creates cognitive overhead and suggests the surface could be simplified through parameterization or resource grouping. A more focused set of 15-25 tools would likely suffice.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for all major domain entities (contacts, customers, expenses, mileage, projects, users, invoices, tags, tasks, time entries). There are no obvious gaps - every resource has create, read, update, and delete operations where appropriate, plus specialized operations like status updates and insights retrieval.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources