Skip to main content
Glama
ArmaghanRazaChaudhary

ContractAudit MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to ContractAudit MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only, provenance-first repository navigation for agents and humans, with ranked lexical retrieval, exact query, document handles, symbol context, and change impact analysis.
      63 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching over 20,000+ smart contract audit findings from Solodit, with filters for severity, firm, tags, and more. Designed for use with AI coding agents like Claude Code and Codex CLI.
      4
      15 npm
      158
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only search and context-pack creation over a local source library, letting AI assistants retrieve relevant excerpts and audit cited quotations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to retrieve human-validated, version-pinned web3 integration recipes and evidence over MCP, with tools for search, exact lookup, dependency inspection, and full-text retrieval. Every result carries re-fetchable citations and honest abstention when no matching evidence exists.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and security researchers to query a curated knowledge base of 1,032 verified smart contract vulnerability findings from Sherlock audit contests, including acceptance rates and examples per vulnerability pattern.
      3
      36 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables local read-only search and retrieval of approved, current evidence via hybrid lexical and dense methods, with tools to get exact source spans, answer from cited passages, and create and verify recheckable evidence packets.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct aspect of the server: retrieving document content, listing source metadata, and reporting system status. No overlapping functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (get_document_context, list_sources), but corpus_status is a noun_noun pair without a verb, breaking full consistency. Overall pattern is clear and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    Three tools is on the low end for a contract audit server, but could be acceptable if the server is narrowly scoped. It borders on feeling thin.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks essential operations like adding or deleting sources, searching across documents, or comparing contracts. Significant gaps impair full audit workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues