Skip to main content
Glama

Keynote: slide image

keynote_slide_image
Read-onlyIdempotent

Export one Keynote slide as a JPEG image to inspect its real rendering, without changing the file. Use it to check a flagged slide's actual design. Requires macOS and Keynote.

Instructions

One slide as an image (JPEG, width px wide), exported by Keynote, so you can look at the design yourself. Skipped slides aren't exported. The file isn't changed. Needs macOS + Keynote. Use to look at a slide's real rendering, e.g. one keynote_review_deck flagged. For a quick preview without Keynote use iwork_thumbnail (first slide, last saved state).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesPath to the .key deck (absolute, or starting with ~).
slideYesSlide number, 1-based (keynote_list_slides lists them).
widthNoImage width in pixels (320–2560).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv2.4.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / path / description
      Added value: +"Path to the .key deck (absolute, or starting with ~)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / slide / description
      Added value: +"Slide number, 1-based (keynote_list_slides lists them)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / width / description
      Added value: +"Image width in pixels (320–2560)."
  2. First observedv2.4.0

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds context beyond the annotations: skipped slides aren't exported, the file is untouched, and it requires macOS + Keynote. The 'file isn't changed' partly restates readOnlyHint, but the environment requirement and skip behavior are genuine additions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core action and the output format, followed by constraints and the alternative. Every clause earns its place, though it is fairly dense across multiple clauses.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With read-only/idempotent annotations, no output schema, and full param coverage, the description supplies the remaining essentials: skip behavior, environment requirement, and the routing to iwork_thumbnail. Nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both `path` and `slide` are already documented. The description only echoes `width` px wide, adding no syntax or format detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource: renders one slide as a JPEG image at a given width. It distinguishes itself from the sibling iwork_thumbnail by explaining that this is the real Keynote rendering versus a quick preview.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use it ('to look at a slide's real rendering, e.g. one keynote_review_deck flagged') and names the alternative with its tradeoff ('For a quick preview without Keynote use iwork_thumbnail'). The condition selecting each is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.