Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Storyblok MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 115 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose based on its name, with no ambiguity. The tools follow a consistent pattern of resource-action pairs (e.g., create_story, fetch_stories, update_story, delete_story), making it easy to distinguish between them. Even without descriptions, the naming convention ensures each tool targets a specific operation on a specific resource.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, using snake_case uniformly. Verbs like create, fetch, get, update, delete are applied predictably across resources (e.g., story, asset, component), with minor variations like 'add_story_to_release' or 'copy_stories_between_branches' still fitting the pattern. There are no deviations in naming style or convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 115 tools, the count is excessive for typical MCP server purposes, making it overwhelming and difficult to manage. While the server covers a broad domain (Storyblok CMS operations), such a large number suggests poor scoping or fragmentation, as many tools could potentially be consolidated or omitted without losing functionality. This heavy toolset will likely confuse agents and increase complexity.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for the Storyblok domain, including resources like stories, assets, components, datasources, spaces, and workflows. It supports creation, fetching, updating, and deletion for most entities, along with advanced operations like publishing, branching, and scheduling. No obvious gaps are present, ensuring agents can handle comprehensive workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive