A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server that gives AI assistants access to Midnight blockchain—search contracts, analyze code, and explore documentation.
30
11 npm
37
MIT
Aries
Related Servers
Alternatives to Aries
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI agents build on GenLayer by searching documentation, inspecting contracts and transactions over RPC, and scaffolding, linting, and testing Intelligent Contracts.4620 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that supercharges AI assistants with powerful tools for software development, enabling research, planning, code generation, and project scaffolding through natural language interaction.1153 npm103MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that enables AI coding assistants to map codebases, transcribe onboarding videos with keyframe screenshots, and maintain structured Obsidian knowledge vaults directly from IDE chat.5-
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides cryptocurrency project data to AI agents11MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAlchemy's official MCP Server. Allow AI agents to interact with Alchemy's blockchain APIs.97280 npm88MIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 21 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting specific resources or actions such as token metadata, oracle pricing, pool details, documentation, incident management, and simulation. No two tools appear to do the same thing; even similar tools like aries_contract_meta and aries_token are differentiated by method and fallback behavior.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow the consistent pattern 'aries_' plus a descriptive snake_case noun phrase. Whether single-word (e.g., aries_simulate) or compound (e.g., aries_oracle_price), the naming is uniform and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
With 21 tools, the set is well-scoped for a complex DeFi protocol. It covers documentation, token/contract interaction, oracle reading, pool management, incidents, constants, and scaffolding without feeling bloated or insufficient.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers core interactions: reading state, documentation retrieval, incident tracking, and code templates. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for listing all contracts by type), but for a read-oriented server, it is largely comprehensive and avoids dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues